CNBC/Hart Research (NBC/WSJ) National: Clinton +9

[heatcharger]

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/27/clinton-nearly-doubles-lead-over-trump-in-latest-cnbc-survey.html

Clinton 46%
Trump 37%

[ApatheticAustrian]

the volatility is mad and influencing my trust in the average.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

the volatility is mad and influencing my trust in the average.

Its really not that volatile. Everything outside of **** trackers are within a reasonable range.

[Fusionmunster]

the volatility is mad and influencing my trust in the average.

It was like this in 2008 two weeks before the election as well. Funny enough, Fox news also released a poll two weeks out showing Obama +3 on McCain.

[Gass3268]

It says this is a doubling of Clinton's lead since the last poll, does anyone know what those results where?

[ProudModerate2]

Nice.

[ApatheticAustrian]

oh i believe that hillary is ahead but between 3 and and 15 points, i don't belive in a +9 lead...well, still +7 would be awesome.

[GeorgiaModerate]

oh i believe that hillary is ahead but between 3 and and 15 points, i don't belive in a +9 lead...well, still +7 would be awesome.

You believe that she's ahead between 3 and 15, but not that she's ahead by 9 (which is the exact average of 3 and 15)?  This does not compute.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

It says this is a doubling of Clinton's lead since the last poll, does anyone know what those results where?

The last poll was in June.

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

YOWZERS!!!  FANTASTICALLY TREMENDOUS!!! 

I'm so zizzled with excitement that another fine pollster is verifying my prediction of Clinton winning the election by 9.  I'm humbled.   

[Dumbo]

oh i believe that hillary is ahead but between 3 and and 15 points, i don't belive in a +9 lead...well, still +7 would be awesome.

My hope is that Clinton wins 270 - 268 and that at least in one of
the Clinton states her lead is just out of the range of a recount.
If this is the result Donald will be furious.

[ApatheticAustrian]

oh i believe that hillary is ahead but between 3 and and 15 points, i don't belive in a +9 lead...well, still +7 would be awesome.

You believe that she's ahead between 3 and 15, but not that she's ahead by 9 (which is the exact average of 3 and 15)?  This does not compute.

you are correct, i misspoke. i meant...i am sure it must be somewhere inside that range but i can't "feel" how high or low. too much noise.

[JerryArkansas]

oh i believe that hillary is ahead but between 3 and and 15 points, i don't belive in a +9 lead...well, still +7 would be awesome.

When you have a 6 point race, polls showing you up 3 and up to 10 are going to happen, with margin of error and whatnot.

[BoAtlantis]

YUGE

[Rand]

The Butcher of Benghazi holds on with 12 days to go. Donald, prepare the lube.

[Devout Centrist]

The Butcher of Benghazi holds on with 12 days to go. Donald, prepare the lube.

I much prefer the Assblaster of Abbottabad.

[IceSpear]

She'll need at least a 20 point lead to counter the surge of Reagan Democrats on election day.

DOOMED!

[Maxwell]

On one hand, i find it odd that there's so much variation of national numbers. On the other hand, I recognize that it is entirely Trump varying from 40% to 45%, while Clinton's variations are between 49-53%.

[IceSpear]

On one hand, i find it odd that there's so much variation of national numbers. On the other hand, I recognize that it is entirely Trump varying from 40% to 45%, while Clinton's variations are between 49-53%.

There's always variation though. I kind of wonder what Atlas's reaction was to the polls on the eve of the election showing McCain only down 2 nationally and down 3 in Minnesota. Was the forum full of bedwetters, concern trolls, and doom prophecies then too?

[Antonio the Sixth]

OK, I feel better now.

[Mr. Morden]

On one hand, i find it odd that there's so much variation of national numbers.

I don't find the amount of variation this year to be anything remarkable.  Is there really more variation than normal?

[Dr. Arch]

It's clear HRC is somewhere between +6-+9.

[Desroko]

On one hand, i find it odd that there's so much variation of national numbers.

I don't find the amount of variation this year to be anything remarkable.  Is there really more variation than normal?

No. Undecideds/someone else are still high, but the two-party is comparable to 2012 and less volatile than 2008 or 2004.

[Obama-Biden Democrat]

oh i believe that hillary is ahead but between 3 and and 15 points, i don't belive in a +9 lead...well, still +7 would be awesome.

My hope is that Clinton wins 270 - 268 and that at least in one of
the Clinton states her lead is just out of the range of a recount.
If this is the result Donald will be furious.

Trump could bribe could a few of the Democratic electors, or his thugs could beat them to near death if they don't switch their votes.

[mark_twain]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Great headline, and very telling!