I guess we all got Batman wrong for the bonus points. I don't see anyone guessing Denison for biggest wing. 
AV is just strange.
So strange that in 145/150 seats, it performed perfectly and ensured an absolutely democratic, quick and correct count and result, and in the other 5 a truly democratic outcome will be reached within days, ensuring every voter's voice is heard properly.
I know I tend to be a bit too parochial, but I genuinely believe that the AEC and the Australian electoral system are as close to perfect as they can be. Add a 151st seat (or remove the 150th) and tweak the senate voting system so people can number every box above the line should they chose to do so, and I'd reckon it'd be perfect.
It's decent, I don't really like the whole thing of the Greens getting 11.5% but only 0.66% of the seats though.
Think of it this way, like the Lib Dems in the UK - the Greens vote is spread throughout the country, while the LibDems have areas of strength like down in Cornwall, the Greens are only now getting traction in higher-educated, more affluent areas of the major cities - so seats like Melbourne, Grayndler and Sydney are being targeted.
The regional thing allows parties like the Nationals to get a 1/3 of the vote of the Greens (4%) and have 7x the number of seats (assuming you don't count Wilkie as an 'Independent Green'.
It's the problem of being broadly popular, without being able to claim a 'heartland' of your own.
