Trump Discussed Pulling U.S. From NATO, Aides Say Amid New Concerns Over Russia (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:52:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Trump Discussed Pulling U.S. From NATO, Aides Say Amid New Concerns Over Russia (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Trump Discussed Pulling U.S. From NATO, Aides Say Amid New Concerns Over Russia  (Read 2220 times)
ηєω ƒяσηтιєя
New Frontier
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,349
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -1.22

« on: January 15, 2019, 11:33:24 AM »

Thanks to all the far-lefties in this thread for showing how idiotic many of you are.
Logged
ηєω ƒяσηтιєя
New Frontier
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,349
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -1.22

« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2019, 12:50:36 PM »

Thanks to all the far-lefties in this thread for showing how idiotic many of you are.

Center-Leftists have been noted in their support for war crimes and corporate interests.

But it's no surprise the centre always loves the fascism of capitalism over socialism.
Center? I'm not a centrist lol.

Also, NATO has it's problems (as does every major international organization) but that doesn't mean that the U.S. should just irresponsibly leave NATO.

Leaving NATO would be a rash, stupid decision by the U.S. (Trump) and would exponentially benefit Vladimir Putin & Russia.
Logged
ηєω ƒяσηтιєя
New Frontier
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,349
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -1.22

« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2019, 10:48:53 PM »

NATO may protect western 'corporate' interests (whatever that means) by proxy of defending Western interests, but aboveall it is a collective security organization, built to prevent the sort of 'creeping' aggression which caused the Second World War. The fundamental premise is that if powerful countries (like France or the United States) join their own security at the hip to the security of weak nations (like Czechoslovakia or Estonia), then potentially dangerous aggressive nations (such as Germany or Russia) can be effectively deterred from taking even minor aggressive steps. If anyone in this thread thinks for a moment after the examples of Georgia and Ukraine that the people of the Baltic states would be living in relative freedom and prosperity today had NATO been disestablished at the end of the Cold War, they are deluded. Further, if anyone in this thread believes that the cost of stationing barrier troops in Europe to shore up the alliance is not worth the liberty of Europeans or preventing the potential cost of global conflict, they are both deluded and have a seriously misaligned moral sense. The only reasons anyone would have to support U.S. withdrawal from NATO is either a fundamental lack of understanding of the way the international system works or a vested interest in the advancement of Russian autocratic influence in Europe, or both.

Man, that's beautifully crafted. Thank you.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.