SB 120-03: Let There Be Duels Amendment - Failed

[GM Team Member and Deputy PPT WB]

it's worth a shot, at least

[GM Team Member and Deputy PPT WB]

One, section 2.4 was struck down in court a while back.

Two, unless it's to get around point one, I don't see the need for this to be a constitutional amendment when the original dueling provision was an ordinary bill.

Three, my own personal position on dueling (for what it's worth) is I wouldn't initiate or take one up myself but anyone in favor of banning the practice – as several people tried recently – are certified wet wipes. As long as you people come up with something that complies with what Poirot and the Supreme Court are saying, I don't mind what it is.

the thing is without deregistration, I'm not sure what stakes there would be, which is kinda the point. Hence why there's been no duels since the bill passed.

[GM Team Member and Deputy PPT WB]

aye