Who will receive more votes (nationwide)? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 01:36:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Who will receive more votes (nationwide)? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who will receive more votes (nationwide)?
#1
Evan McMullin
#2
Jill Stein
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Who will receive more votes (nationwide)?  (Read 1009 times)
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,637
United States


« on: October 22, 2016, 10:44:28 PM »
« edited: October 23, 2016, 12:07:00 AM by Eraserhead »

The people voting for McMullin are really confused. If Stein gets 3% in California, 2.5% in New York, 1% in Florida (where you can't even write in McMullin), etc. do you realize what a big hole that puts him in?

You have to take into account that having write-in access isn't worth jack sh*t in most cases and in many states he doesn't even have that.

He might win Utah with like 30% of the vote and grab like 10% in Idaho. They're both small states though. Where else is he going to make up the votes that Stein grabs in the big states? The math just doesn't add up.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,637
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2016, 01:46:10 AM »

Voter participation was low enough in the Deep South in '48 that total votes in SC+MS+AL were about equal to UT+ID that year in spite of having 3.5x the EVs.

Yeah, but Thurmond won them overwhelmingly. He got over 70% in all of them.

If McMullin wins Utah, and I hope he does, it will be by the skin of his teeth in a multi-candidate race.
He's not going to even come close to winning Idaho, there aren't enough Mormons/Trump haters there for it to happen.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,637
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2016, 01:52:55 AM »
« Edited: October 23, 2016, 02:53:35 AM by Eraserhead »

The people voting for McMullin are really confused. If Stein gets 3% in California, 2.5% in New York, 1% in Florida (where you can't even write in McMullin), etc. do you realize what a big hole that puts him in?

I mean, if those numbers are right, sure, she'll top McMullin, but in 2012 Stein got 0.66% in CA, 0.56% in NY, and 0.11% in FL. What basis do you have to think she'll improve that dramatically on her numbers? Remember that in 2012 she wasn't widely known to be a batsh**t anti-vaccine, anti-wifi (wtf?), #LockHerUp conspiracy theorist. Oh, and let's not forget the loony anti-semite she chose for a running mate this time around.

In 2012, she wasn't widely known at all. She's a much more significant factor this year for obvious reasons. That said, she could do a lot worse than I have her doing in those states and still beat McMullin easily because he's not on the ballot in any of them (meaning almost nobody is going to vote for him in the most highly populated states in the country).

If McMullin can even match Stein's 2012 nationwide total, that'd be pretty impressive.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.