They're already naming stuff after the guy... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:15:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  They're already naming stuff after the guy... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: They're already naming stuff after the guy...  (Read 1951 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« on: November 23, 2008, 02:53:36 AM »
Quote from: Mike Keller on November 23, 2008, 02:07:40 AM
Quote from: Lunar on November 23, 2008, 02:03:35 AM
I'd be so chill with Obama or Reagan pushing Grant off the $50.

I would say Reagan.

Has anybody brought one of those Obama plates?

I'd like Reagan on the $50.

But about Obama - who cares.  There's nothing wrong with naming something after him.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2008, 03:36:16 AM »
Quote from: Lunar on November 23, 2008, 03:16:33 AM
Anyway, the consensus should be that Grant has no place anywhere near the top 40 of presidents.

Just think - what if they made a Harding bill?  lol
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2008, 04:05:15 AM »
Quote from: Aceptaré mis elogios on November 23, 2008, 03:45:31 AM
The anti-dictatorial side of me (inherited from parents who lived in Maoist China) finds this scary.

Why?
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2008, 03:20:17 PM »
Quote from: Wall St. Wiz on November 23, 2008, 09:32:32 AM

Because Obama is an authoritarian.  He clears the playing field, eliminates his opposition so they can't even compete.  This is how he won his state senate seat.  This is why he chose Hillary for Sec of State (to prevent her from running a primary against him in 2012).  I wouldn't put it past him to suspend the 2012 election for whatever reason and attempt to become president for life.

Clinton wasn't gonna run against him in 2012.  And if she did, she wouldn't win.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.