Do you believe Link was an Einzige sock? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 07:53:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Do you believe Link was an Einzige sock? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you believe Link was an Einzige sock?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 46

Author Topic: Do you believe Link was an Einzige sock?  (Read 2031 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« on: April 01, 2014, 02:56:18 AM »

Considering that Einzige has apparently created another sock, I can confirm that there is no evidence whatsoever that Link and Einzige are the same (and now quite a bit of evidence that they are in fact not the same).
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2014, 05:54:59 PM »

Who ever suggested this in order for BRTD to make the poll? Or is it yet another one of those strawmen BRTD likes to construct just to beat around?

Wasn't Link and Einzege sock?  That's kind of why I liked him sometimes.  Einzige was an ignorant as well, but he was well read and well written, and we got along.

Considering that Einzige has apparently created another sock, I can confirm that there is no evidence whatsoever that Link and Einzige are the same (and now quite a bit of evidence that they are in fact not the same).

I've also received confirmation of this from Einzige himself, who also doesn't seem too happy or amused at the premise.

However I don't see Grumps changing his insistence despite all the new counter-evidence as well.

Why do you care so much?  You're getting all worked up over what amounts to pretty much nothing...
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2014, 06:54:37 PM »

Who ever suggested this in order for BRTD to make the poll? Or is it yet another one of those strawmen BRTD likes to construct just to beat around?

Wasn't Link and Einzege sock?  That's kind of why I liked him sometimes.  Einzige was an ignorant as well, but he was well read and well written, and we got along.

Considering that Einzige has apparently created another sock, I can confirm that there is no evidence whatsoever that Link and Einzige are the same (and now quite a bit of evidence that they are in fact not the same).

I've also received confirmation of this from Einzige himself, who also doesn't seem too happy or amused at the premise.

However I don't see Grumps changing his insistence despite all the new counter-evidence as well.

Why do you care so much?  You're getting all worked up over what amounts to pretty much nothing...

Inks, meet BRTD. BRTD, Inks.

Well yeah, but he's taken his quirkiness to a new level on this one.  It's like his BRTDness is on steroids.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2014, 12:58:07 PM »

It's a view as irrational and moronic as Truthers and Birthers.

Perhaps now, but back when Grumps actually made the statement, there was actually some circumstantial evidence that supported it.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2014, 10:24:55 AM »

It's a view as irrational and moronic as Truthers and Birthers.

Perhaps now, but back when Grumps actually made the statement, there was actually some circumstantial evidence that supported it.

That's a bit of a stretch.

"OMG! Someone angry and easily irritable is posting now and there was someone who was angry and easily irritable in the past who was banned! It must be the same person because we all know such traits are very rare to find on the Internet!"

It was more than that.  You don't actually know what it was, and I'd rather not disclose it publicly, but you have no clue whether or not it's a stretch at all, since you weren't actually privy to the evidence.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2014, 06:17:36 PM »

It's a view as irrational and moronic as Truthers and Birthers.

Perhaps now, but back when Grumps actually made the statement, there was actually some circumstantial evidence that supported it.

That's a bit of a stretch.

"OMG! Someone angry and easily irritable is posting now and there was someone who was angry and easily irritable in the past who was banned! It must be the same person because we all know such traits are very rare to find on the Internet!"

It was more than that.  You don't actually know what it was, and I'd rather not disclose it publicly, but you have no clue whether or not it's a stretch at all, since you weren't actually privy to the evidence.

I read every thread on the mod board, Inks, and I honestly have no clue what you're talking about.  I don't remember anyone ever presenting any evidence that suggested that Link was a sock.  But admittedly, discussion of Link's behavior has existed on and off for 2+ years, so I'm not necessarily going to remember everything that was said back in 2012.  Tongue


I never brought it to the mod board because it was brought to me after he'd already been banned, and was easily debunkable as a mod (but not someone without access to the IP tools).
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2014, 07:50:00 PM »

It's a view as irrational and moronic as Truthers and Birthers.

Perhaps now, but back when Grumps actually made the statement, there was actually some circumstantial evidence that supported it.

That's a bit of a stretch.

"OMG! Someone angry and easily irritable is posting now and there was someone who was angry and easily irritable in the past who was banned! It must be the same person because we all know such traits are very rare to find on the Internet!"

It was more than that.  You don't actually know what it was, and I'd rather not disclose it publicly, but you have no clue whether or not it's a stretch at all, since you weren't actually privy to the evidence.

I read every thread on the mod board, Inks, and I honestly have no clue what you're talking about.  I don't remember anyone ever presenting any evidence that suggested that Link was a sock.  But admittedly, discussion of Link's behavior has existed on and off for 2+ years, so I'm not necessarily going to remember everything that was said back in 2012.  Tongue


I never brought it to the mod board because it was brought to me after he'd already been banned, and was easily debunkable as a mod (but not someone without access to the IP tools).

Now I'm really confused.  You say that there was circumstantial evidence suggesting that he was a sock.  But that it was evidence only available to mods, yet you were the only mod who actually looked at it or even knew that it existed, and once you looked at it, you debunked it and realized that it didn't suggest that he was a sock at all?  OK…….


It was only available to me, not all the mods. But being a mod, it was easily proven to be false.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 11 queries.