SB 30-24: Fair Chance at Housing Act (Awaiting Sponsor) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 01:41:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 30-24: Fair Chance at Housing Act (Awaiting Sponsor) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 30-24: Fair Chance at Housing Act (Awaiting Sponsor)  (Read 1655 times)
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« on: July 02, 2021, 11:18:59 AM »

I'll sponsor this bill.
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2021, 06:04:08 PM »

This bill is pretty simple, it prevents landlords from denying a lease to tenants with a criminal record except for the crimes listed in Subsection (2)(b).
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2021, 10:39:14 PM »


(e) TwoMulti-family dwelling exception. —

Subsection (2)(a) shall not apply to landlords renting a twomulti-family dwelling in which they live as their main residence.

My concern was balancing this without creating a loophole where the landlord puts the building as their main residence, even if its like an apartment type housing with dozens of families.
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2021, 11:06:13 PM »


(e) TwoMulti-family dwelling exception. —

Subsection (2)(a) shall not apply to landlords renting a twomulti-family dwelling in which they live as their main residence.

My concern was balancing this without creating a loophole where the landlord puts the building as their main residence, even if its like an apartment type housing with dozens of families.

That is a valid concern. What if I withdraw my current amendment and propose a new amendment where landlords are entitled to be exempt in housing situations with multiple families, except for apartment complexes or condominiums?

I set the exception at a two-family house because many people rent out the other side/floor of their house as more of side income rather than a main income. By doing this it separates a family just trying to make a little extra money from a landlord renting out 3+ family semi-detached houses as a main income source. Also creating a definition separating apartments and condos from the requirements creates a lot of loopholes, as for example what would a 3+ family "apartment style" semi-detached houses be classified as.
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2021, 07:20:05 PM »

I certainly understand the concerns of property owners who may be concerned that their property is used to traffic or manufacture drugs and obviously would and should possess the ability to preclude such activities from transpiring on their premises.

I agree from local irl experience, with the dangerous production of drugs like methamphetamine and others in multifamily houses causing explosions and fires. It is a real safety hazard that differs from just having a record of processing drugs.
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2021, 11:34:05 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.