Option 2 or 3. I lean closer to option 1 than to option 4 if I absolutely had to choose because I think it's possible for the state to be overconcerned with fetal health to the point of it becoming a eugenic attitude.
If regulating public physical health and safety
without regard for genetics risks becoming eugenics, what is eugenics? Is physical education eugenic? Is welfare spending eugenic? The argument against genetics has always been that it is unfairly discriminatory because it is based in genetic divergence — but I can't see a whiff of that here.