Is it intolerant to wish to feed opebo to the lions? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 11:42:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Is it intolerant to wish to feed opebo to the lions? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: See above
#1
Yes (religious)		  
#2
No (religious)		  
#3
Yes (secular)		  
#4
No (secular)		  
#5
Yes but please do it anyway		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 32

Author Topic: Is it intolerant to wish to feed opebo to the lions?  (Read 1647 times)
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009
« on: October 16, 2005, 10:59:06 AM »
Quote from: A18 on October 16, 2005, 05:52:22 AM
His support for child molestation makes me not care so much.

Freedom-hating prude.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2005, 11:09:46 AM »
Quote from: deadeyeaim on October 16, 2005, 11:07:49 AM
Quote from: opebo on October 16, 2005, 10:59:06 AM
Quote from: A18 on October 16, 2005, 05:52:22 AM
His support for child molestation makes me not care so much.

Freedom-hating prude.

for some reason i dont think that child molestation is protected by the constitution.

It certainly should be covered by the right to privacy.  In any case, something doesn't have to be unconstitutional for opposing it to be prudish.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2005, 11:25:47 AM »
Quote from: deadeyeaim on October 16, 2005, 11:15:02 AM
Quote from: opebo on October 16, 2005, 11:09:46 AM
Quote from: deadeyeaim on October 16, 2005, 11:07:49 AM
Quote from: opebo on October 16, 2005, 10:59:06 AM
Quote from: A18 on October 16, 2005, 05:52:22 AM
His support for child molestation makes me not care so much.

Freedom-hating prude.

for some reason i dont think that child molestation is protected by the constitution.

It certainly should be covered by the right to privacy.  In any case, something doesn't have to be unconstitutional for opposing it to be prudish.

for some odd reason, i find that bangin an 8 year old, even in private, is horribly horribly wrong.

Yes, yes, you're a prude.  This comes as no surprise.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.