Battleground Poll, any others accurate? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 01:41:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Battleground Poll, any others accurate? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Battleground Poll, any others accurate?  (Read 5898 times)
agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740
« on: November 03, 2004, 01:24:10 PM »
Yeah, I went over and saw that quote.  Unbelievable.
Logged
agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2004, 01:32:24 PM »
Gallup did well.  I do think they regret that stupid allocating all undecided to Kerry.  That made no sense.  However, the poll as it came out (49-47) was pretty good.  Battleground was incredible.
Logged
agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2004, 02:29:18 PM »
Yeah, Mason-Dixon did nail the big two state races dead on.  They proved to be as good as advertised.  Oh, and I believe Strategic Vision also nailed those two states dead on.  Strategic Vision for an (R) leaning firm did pretty well.  They were close in Georgia, Iowa and Wisconsin as well.

Mason-Dixon clearly deserves the blue ribbon.
Logged
agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2004, 04:20:59 PM »
That's an unbelievable.  Coker and company obviously know what they are doing.

On the other hand, Gallup's state polling was pitiful this year.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.