Seems very plausible based on the 2020-2021 population changes, at which NC was growing faster than GA. Will be a very close-run thing either way, though.
I'm a bit confused about their 2021 estimates though because they seem to be in line with their 2020 estimates rather than the true 2020 numbers. For 2021 numbers, they have states like NY and RI (which outperformed in the census) doing rlly badly), whereas underperformers like NC and AZ did really well.
It's well established that the 2020 census numbers erred in a meaningful way. The North was generally overestimated by several % and the South was generally underestimated by several %. The 2020 census error margin was on a scale not seen since before WWII. I would be very careful extrapolating these numbers.
How do we know that it's actually an error on the census's part rather than them just being lazy with estimates?
It'd be hilarious though if Trump singlehandedly cost Rs an extra seat in FL and TX they otherwise would've gotten.
They acknowledge it here: https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2022/05/2020-census-undercount-overcount-rates-by-state.html
The New York overcount and the Florida and Texas undercounts are likely >500K people each. This is not normal.
If true, those are some really awful errors. I can understand underoc**nting, especially in states like TX where you have a lot of non-English speakers and stuff, but overcount in NY? It's not like we just have tons of abandoned homes that they could say people live in or smtg.
Yes. Unless something happens to make life in the South uniquely undesirable, we are likely to see a ton of CDs move in 2031. I wouldn't be shocked by something like TX +4, FL +3, AZ+2, GA +1.
Where do those seats come from? You think wv, ri, ny, midwestern states lose more? Maybe ca continues to stagnates
