Why were GM and Chrysler bailed out? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:36:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Why were GM and Chrysler bailed out? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why were GM and Chrysler bailed out?  (Read 739 times)
Jacobtm
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,216


« on: May 28, 2009, 11:53:57 AM »

When GM and Chrysler's bailouts were initially being discussed, some people said that they should just be allowed to go bankrupt. The majority (it seems) thought this was an absurd idea. Now Chrysler is bankrupt and GM is about to declare bankruptcy.

So what good did the bailout do? It just delayed bankruptcy as far as I can tell, and was a collosal waste of money.
Logged
Jacobtm
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,216


« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2009, 12:04:47 PM »

They were the most politically acceptable thing to do.  Now that is to let them go bankrupt.  Recent actions have proved beyond a doubt that this administration is less about substantial ideological strategy as it is about politically motivated publicity stunts.

George Bush approved the first bailout.

The argument isn't whether Obama and politicians do whatever is politically easiest, the argument is over the merits of the bailouts. There are tons of people who defended the bailouts as the best idea in terms of economics, not as the politically expedient thing to do.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 11 queries.