Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 09:58:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in  (Read 50608 times)
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW
« on: August 08, 2006, 09:16:55 PM »

Turnout in Hartford was reportedly 80%; that would usually indicate enthusiasm for one candidate.  But who in this case?
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2006, 09:35:21 PM »

I think Lamont could have enough momentum to win a general election; it may seem like a claim that is not based on reality now but as the Democratic nominee he would have the support of the DNC and DSCC and presumably get visits from Howard Dean and Hillary Clinton.  I think that Lieberman would find it hard to mount a significant challenge given the fact that official support for him would melt away and his Senate colleagues might even publicly call for him to stand aside.  
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2006, 09:57:03 PM »

Apparently absentee ballots were quite strong for Lamont.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2006, 10:10:23 PM »

Joe Lieberman has conceded and called Lamont: "I am disappointed but not discouraged that we lost".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.