Any Other Dems Slightly Scared Now? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 06:09:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Any Other Dems Slightly Scared Now? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Any Other Dems Slightly Scared Now?  (Read 6074 times)
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« on: October 06, 2012, 03:05:07 PM »
« edited: October 06, 2012, 03:32:13 PM by Politico »

Romney is the greatest champion of free market economics since Reagan. On the social front, he has a moderate temperament but is a tolerant conservative, if you will.

I have been saying both of the above for months. The debate proved that I am right.

Many Democrats have good reason to lose faith, and most Independents understandably have no trust in anything coming out of the Obama camp anymore: That image that Obama's Chicago guys painted of Romney was a figment of their imagination.

Romney's pledge to reform taxes in such a way that they do not add to the deficit nor do they raise taxes on anybody is the pledge he is committed to. The 20% across-the-board is something he can walk away from so long as he remains committed to the aforementioned pledges (He did not want to make that promise, but had to, to beat Santorum in Michigan). With regards to Obamacare, he will repeal it but replace it with a regulation stating that companies cannot discriminate based upon preexisting conditions (yes, costs will rise, but that's the price you pay for an insurance policy mandated by the law). With regards to Dodd-Frank, he will repeal it and replace it by bringing back Glass-Steagall (the only people who no longer favor this are some people in the "Too Big to Fail" New York banks that still have Obama in their pocket). The list goes on and on...
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2012, 03:34:20 PM »

I'm worried, yeah. I think that nearly everything could happen: it could prove totally inconsequential, with the jobs numbers erasing all Romney's gains

This is not going to happen. It would take 17 years of 114,000 jobs per month to create 23 million jobs. Some folks in the media can spin numbers to push their hidden agenda, but the American public is not THAT stupid.

Who wants four more years of the last four years? Not many people, which is why Obama's ONLY hope was convincing a majority that Romney is a monster, a risky gambit. Obama failed to do this, which is why he will lose.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2012, 12:37:02 AM »

Can we ban Opebo already? He/she doesn't belong here.

Don't be ridiculous.

Opebo has as much right to express his views as anyone else.

If you don't like what he has to say, then don't read it.

This.

Winfield is a Freedom Fighter like no other! Win WITH Winfield!
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2012, 11:58:21 AM »
« Edited: October 07, 2012, 12:12:53 PM by Politico »

No.  The jobs numbers negated the debate.  It's over.  Obama loses NC and IN, but wins all his states from '08.

Excuse me, but it would take 17 years of 114,000 jobs per month to create 23 million jobs. This year is worse than last year, and last year was worse than the year before that. 50% of college graduates this year have been unable to find work. 50%! Finally, if labor participation were still at the levels seen four years ago, if so many people had not given up hope, unemployment would be over 11% today. Do you really believe people want four more years of the last four years?

One, the American public is not stupid. Two, the American public is increasingly catching on to the scheming of the left-wing LGBT activists embedded (closeted, in many cases) within much of the media (even non-political and moderate gays are becoming aware of the out-of-touch reporting and why it is happening).
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2012, 02:15:35 PM »
« Edited: October 07, 2012, 02:18:28 PM by Politico »

I don't think its a good strategy to attack white people with calling them all racists, when you are trying to keep white people wanting to vote for a "safe black guy"  

If you're trying to keep White guilt alive by blaming Obama's failures on racism, then you are doing a bad job at it.  

Obama stopped running on the issues a long time ago.  His supporters are now interested in flaming Race Wars.  

And, mark my words, religious wars if Obama bombs the second debate. The atheistic wing of the Democratic Party, the types who want to ram gay marriage down North Carolina's throats while taxing work and rewarding bull[Inks], will start saying the most vile and repulsive things imaginable about Mormons if Obama falters in the second debate...
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2012, 02:20:23 PM »

Let's see, my next door neighbor had to go on welfare because her dress making business suffered.  The local pastor filed for bankruptcy.  My play nephew can't find a job, despite a degree from Millersville.  About a quarter of the businesses in my neighborhood have closed.

[sarcasm]I'm so glad we have a president that helps black people.[/sarcasm]

Yeah, exactly. And bringing up racism all of the time is not leading America towards the promise of eventually being a color blind society.

Furthermore, one only needs to look at Valerie Jarrett to see what Obama is all about. She was CEO of a real estate company that gave predatory subprime mortgages to poor minorities in Chicago. These Chicago types in the Obama Administration just sell poor people a bill of goods while bending them over the figurative wood pile. It's the Chicago Way.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2012, 02:57:19 PM »
« Edited: October 07, 2012, 02:59:15 PM by Politico »

Black unemployment at 14% under this incompetent, yet still they continue to support this poor excuse for a President with 96%.

Blacks, like all other Americans, would be far better off under the Romney plan.

Dems continue to take black support for granted because they know they can.
How would we be better off under Governor Romney's plan then?


In a word, the return of job opportunities for everybody no matter what one's race, sex, or age is. It will take time, but by the end of Romney's first term we will see a REAL turn around, not this BS right now that is being touted as success by people with a hidden agenda...
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #7 on: October 07, 2012, 06:36:57 PM »
« Edited: October 07, 2012, 06:39:32 PM by Politico »

Black unemployment at 14% under this incompetent, yet still they continue to support this poor excuse for a President with 96%.

Blacks, like all other Americans, would be far better off under the Romney plan.

Dems continue to take black support for granted because they know they can.
How would we be better off under Governor Romney's plan then?


In a word, the return of job opportunities for everybody no matter what one's race, sex, or age is. It will take time, but by the end of Romney's first term we will see a REAL turn around, not this BS right now that is being touted as success by people with a hidden agenda...
I don't want a platitude. What aspect specifically of Governor Romney's plan would make us better off?

The five cornerstones (i.e., the alternative to four more years of the last four years):

www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkrwUU_YApE#t=03m04s
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.