Romney fires debate aide for being successful at the expense of his boss... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 11:20:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Romney fires debate aide for being successful at the expense of his boss... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Romney fires debate aide for being successful at the expense of his boss...  (Read 5708 times)
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« on: February 05, 2012, 12:39:09 AM »
« edited: February 05, 2012, 12:42:08 AM by Politico »

The signal is clear: No more debating until Obama.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2012, 12:56:54 AM »

The signal is clear: No more debating until Obama.

Since you like to pretend you speak for his campaign, I'm going to assume that you don't realize how much Romney's attitude pisses off those who don't support him.

Look, Romney is ultimately responsible for Romney's comeback. Go ask Rick Perry about having great advisers and the best of resources.

I know it pisses off a lot of people, Democrats included, that Mitt is now the presumptive nominee, but that's the case. O'Donnell will obviously advise him before the debates with Obama because that's the prudent thing to do: Get the best debate adviser in the nation to advise you before debates. Obviously it does not make sense to have the best debate adviser on your team when you are not going to debate again until late September/early October. I strongly suspect the scheduled debate for February is no longer going to happen, and thank goodness. We've had one too many GOP debates already. How many have we had: 20? People, even people who love politics like us, have seen enough of them.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2012, 01:04:09 AM »
« Edited: February 05, 2012, 01:06:07 AM by Politico »

The signal is clear: No more debating until Obama.

Since you like to pretend you speak for his campaign, I'm going to assume that you don't realize how much Romney's attitude pisses off those who don't support him.

Look, Romney is ultimately responsible for Romney's comeback. Go ask Rick Perry about having great advisers and the best of resources.

I know it pisses off a lot of people, Democrats included, that Mitt is now the presumptive nominee, but that's the case. O'Donnell will obviously advise him before the debates with Obama because that's the prudent thing to do: Get the best debate adviser in the nation to advise you before debates. Obviously it does not make sense to have the best debate adviser on your team when you are not going to debate again until late September/early October. I strongly suspect the scheduled debate for February is no longer going to happen, and thank goodness. We've had one too many GOP debates already. How many have we had: 20? People, even people who love politics like us, have seen enough of them.

In other words, use, abuse and throw away when not necessary, is your argument.  Nice to know that you have as much morals as your head, the wannabe Mormon-in-Chief.

I am sure O'Donnell was well compensated for his services, and will be well compensated in the future when the campaign brings him back on-board for the real debates (you know, the debates with Obama that Gingrich said he would refuse to participate in).

It seems to me the Romney campaign has decided there will be no more GOP debates, so it does not make sense to keep a debate adviser on-board indefinitely, especially if he is going to get more credit than he deserves. If it was all about O'Donnell, who is really a hired gun, Bachmann would be the nominee right now.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2012, 01:19:01 AM »

The anti-Mormon rhetoric sure is ugly. Is the left only good nowadays at being hateful towards religion, and successful people? You do realize this is the United States, not the Soviet Union, right? It's favorable to be religious and successful in America.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2012, 01:22:32 AM »


I am not a religious person, nor have I ever reported any post on this Forum, but you are being very disrespectful towards religious people, specifically Mormons, with this type of rhetoric.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2012, 01:33:29 AM »
« Edited: February 05, 2012, 01:47:14 AM by Politico »

The anti-Mormon rhetoric sure is ugly. Is the left only good nowadays at being hateful towards religion, and successful people? You do realize this is the United States, not the Soviet Union, right? It's favorable to be religious and successful in America.

With this type of response, I have to conclude that you don't know anything about this country.

90% of America believes in some sort of God. Most people in America want to be successful.

This is not complicated, Sam. Being religious, and most certainly respecting freedom of religion, is the norm in America. Striving to be successful is what America is all about. Hating religion and successful people is not normal outside of certain faculties on college campuses. It is not even normal in the Democratic Party to hate religion and successful people.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2012, 01:40:45 AM »
« Edited: February 05, 2012, 01:45:54 AM by Politico »

The anti-Mormon rhetoric sure is ugly. Is the left only good nowadays at being hateful towards religion, and successful people? You do realize this is the United States, not the Soviet Union, right? It's favorable to be religious and successful in America.

With this type of response, I have to conclude that you don't know anything about this country.

90% of America believes in some sort of God. Most people in America have ambition and want to be successful.

This is not complicated, Sam. Being religious, and most certainly respecting freedom of religion, is the norm in America. Striving to be successful is what America is all about. Hating religion and successful people is not normal outside of certain faculties on college campuses.

I hear Mitt Romney is looking for some platitudes to borrow.  Can you share?

Sure: Our ancestors came out to America looking for freedom, not a free ride. They came in pursuit of happiness, not government benefits.

Do you believe in an America that is the best, or do you want to transform America into another socialist cesspool? That is the choice of this decade.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 13 queries.