Do you think this country would be better off without suburbs? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 07:25:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Do you think this country would be better off without suburbs? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you think this country would be better off without suburbs?
#1
Yes (R)
 
#2
No (R)
 
#3
Yes (D)
 
#4
No (D)
 
#5
Yes (I/Third Party)
 
#6
No (I/Third Party)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 60

Author Topic: Do you think this country would be better off without suburbs?  (Read 8587 times)
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

« on: December 11, 2005, 12:58:55 PM »

No. We need the suburbs.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2007, 10:15:46 AM »

Yes. Very much so and not just for the reason that if we lived with housing patterns/lifestyles more like western europe we'd STILL be an  oil exporter 30 years after domestic oil production peaked. If post-WWII development had focused on expanding current cities and building highrise apartments/more multi-household buildings with commercial districts nearby we'd have much less sprawl. Another positive effect would have been no rise of the sunbelt(the northeast corridor dominates politics/culture because building would be focused on expanding of existing cities and no favoring dixie). Also without massive suburban sprawl we'd have more natural land/farmland free(as other posters have pointed out importing corn/wheat would lead us to being embroiled in international... trouble). Also suburbia fosters the conformist anthill mentality which causes alot of our problems here in the US.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2007, 11:26:01 AM »

Yes. Very much so and not just for the reason that if we lived with housing patterns/lifestyles more like western europe we'd STILL be an  oil exporter 30 years after domestic oil production peaked. If post-WWII development had focused on expanding current cities and building highrise apartments/more multi-household buildings with commercial districts nearby we'd have much less sprawl. Another positive effect would have been no rise of the sunbelt(the northeast corridor dominates politics/culture because building would be focused on expanding of existing cities and no favoring dixie). Also without massive suburban sprawl we'd have more natural land/farmland free(as other posters have pointed out importing corn/wheat would lead us to being embroiled in international... trouble). Also suburbia fosters the conformist anthill mentality which causes alot of our problems here in the US.

One of the dumbest things I have heard all year.

No. My point is actually valid. Suburbia's downsides(too many to name) are far worse than any benefits(seeing green, no poors nearby, ghetto "culture" kept far away).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.