IL-GOV 2018: Which Illinois Democrat can beat Gov. Bruce Rauner? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 10:12:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  IL-GOV 2018: Which Illinois Democrat can beat Gov. Bruce Rauner? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which Illinois Democrat can beat Gov. Bruce Rauner?
#1
State Senator Daniel Biss
 
#2
Chris Kennedy
 
#3
Chicago Alderman Ameya Pawar
 
#4
J.B. Pritzker
 
#5
Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart
 
#6
Valerie Jarrett
 
#7
Former First Lady Michelle Obama
 
#8
Former President Barack Obama
 
#9
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel
 
#10
Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan
 
#11
Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan
 
#12
State Senator Kwame Raoul
 
#13
Jonathan Jackson
 
#14
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 62

Author Topic: IL-GOV 2018: Which Illinois Democrat can beat Gov. Bruce Rauner?  (Read 3350 times)
#gravelgang #lessiglad
Serious_Username
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,615
United States


« on: May 22, 2017, 11:11:31 AM »

All of the above.
The question should be about the margin of victory.

Highest to lowest potential margin of victory (ceiling) among the Dems running: Biss>Pawar>Kennedy>>>>>>Pritzker.

Biss (and to a lesser extent, Pawar) would generate more Sanders-wing turnout and votes; Pawar may be able to run up the score among Asian-American voters that are numerous in the suburbs, enough so to keep the Chicago burbs outside of Cook competitive. Kennedy is still RFK's son, which, somehow, still matters to a lot of people, even though the man has serious anti-charisma, and Pritzker is Democratic Bruce Rauner.
Logged
#gravelgang #lessiglad
Serious_Username
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,615
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2017, 11:33:39 AM »

Anyone besides Literally Rauner with a D next to his name (Pritzker) would be favored.

With Pritzker its pure tossup.

Pritzker will win by 5 points, all our IL governors' races end up being that way  Blago won by 6 and Rauner won by 5.  And Pritzker will win 50-45%

I really want to caution against this line of thinking. Rauner's initial election was the product of a confluence of Illinois-specific factors (the perception that Mike Madigan runs the state, the state's steadily worsening fiscal condition, loss of jobs and emigration resulting from said fiscal condition, etc.). All of these pushed enough voters to elect a moderate Republican to push back against the perceived Illinois machine. These factors are still present and any perception that Pritzker and Madigan are aligned would be a hindrance to the voters in Illinois who, for instance, cast a ballot for Obama, then Rauner, then HRC in three successive elections.

Today is the final day of the Illinois legislative session and the House is taking up a compromise bill between the Governor and the State Senate. Any whiff that Madigan is blocking this compromise / "grand bargain" will hurt any D backed by Madigan in the Governor's race.

Not because voters really pay that close of attention, but because Gov Rauner will spend every day on the campaign trail and every tv ad saying that he and the State Senate had a deal to fund the state government, but the Pritzker-Madigan machine blocked it. And it'll play. Exceedingly well. Especially in the suburbs.

A Kennedy or Biss would be able to distance themselves and could sell themselves to voters as a left of center choice (ideologically fits the state) who wouldn't be beholden to Madigan (independent voice).

 In short, "Generic D" would be favored against Rauner, but Pritzker is hardly "Generic D."
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.