Have any of you actually researched any of her positions besides Assad?
"calls for a restoration of the Glass–Steagall Act,"
"called for the breakup of Wells Fargo Bank"
"strongly opposed the Trans-Pacific Partnership"
"called for an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan"
"traveled to North Dakota to join the protests against the construction of the final leg of the Dakota Access Pipeline near the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River Indian Reservations"
"supports full funding for Medicare and Social Security and opposes efforts to reduce benefits"
"favors allowing Medicare to negotiate with prescription drug firms to secure lower prescription drug prices"
"is pro-choice"
"cosponsored a bill that would let illegal immigrants serve in the US military"
"opposed the Defense of Marriage Act"
"introduced legislation to take marijuana off the federal controlled substances list"
"spoke against Trump's executive order banning refugees"
I don't think a single Republican would agree with all those statements.
I think a lot of Gabbard's bad rep comes from the fact that his father vocally opposed gay marriage.
As a member of the Hawaii House of Representatives, Tulsi Gabbard had this to say about a civil unions bill:
This bill is very disrespectful to the people of Hawaii who have already made their opinion very clear on this matter. As Democrats we should be supporting the will of the people and not a small number of homosexual extremists.
Citation: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/05/tulsi-gabbard-president-sanders-democratic-party
Tulsi Gabbard can go jump in a lake as far as I’m concerned. She only changed her positions to match the political weathervane.
I couldn't care less if Gabbard said that over a decade ago. She supports gay marriage today, and it's not like she would do anything about that.
As Skunk pointed out, the majority of Democratic politicians – Obama, Biden, Clinton included – opposed same-sex marriage at that time.
And, for sure, the will of the people has changed, has it not?
