Seat Belt Laws (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 01:54:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Seat Belt Laws (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Constitutionally...
#1
Sound
 
#2
Unsound
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 28

Author Topic: Seat Belt Laws  (Read 14349 times)
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« on: September 14, 2006, 01:33:04 AM »
« edited: September 14, 2006, 02:05:38 AM by memphis »

Seat Belt laws serve the public interest in that a huge sum of public money is spent addressing head traumas that unbuckled motorists receive in accidents.  Saving these funds is the intent of such laws. Since these laws are not federal laws, they only need not violate any rights protected under the Constitution. As far as I can tell, they seem constitutional. Regardless of the law, I urge everybody to wear their seatbelts. Amid America's fascination with safety, we are completely overlooking the fact that roughly 40,000 Americans (roughly comprable to the number killed during the entirety of Vietnam) are killed each year in automobile accidents. Over a million people worldwide are killed each year.  Somehow the TV totally ignores this.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2006, 02:09:51 AM »

It would be in the "public interest" to install seat belts on toilets as well, because someone might fall off and hit their head on the pointy corner of the bathroom sink that needs a protective rubber coating.
People fall down stairs everyday, so why not pass a law outlawing any structure that requires someone to step up?
People choke on food all the time, so should we pass a law requiring food to only be served in liquid form, but not hot liquid because you might get burned and not cold liquid because you may get "ice-cream headache"?
How about beds? They should be required to have rails around the side because people fall out of bed all the time.

You see where I'm going with this (hopefully). Once you allow the government to tell you what you have to do for "your safety" in public, they will soon be able to tell you what you can do for "your safety" in private as well.

With that being said, I will now put my federally mandated helmet back on my head, so that if I fall I will not sustain life-threatening injuries requiring millions of tax-dollars to remain in a vegetative state.

I think that you are missing the scale of car accidents. All of your mock examples are highly unlikely events.  Over 100 Americans die in car accidents every day. We need to minimize the governement money spent on health care for the far greater number who survive. Just to rile the conservatives, I'll point out that their " I don't want the government protecting me from my own stupidity" argument also implies support for the repeal of laws prohibiting drug use.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.