Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 12:04:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Parts of the Bible are divinely-inspired, but not all of the Bible is literally true, in historical or scientific understanding or even moral teaching -- and that truth from God can come from other sources besides the Bible too... (see post)
#1
Agree
 
#2
Disagree
 
#3
Unsure
 
#4
Not Christian
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 28

Author Topic: Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection?  (Read 3015 times)
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,936
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

« on: April 11, 2020, 11:58:20 PM »

Not a Christian, but it's really hard to parse on account of how it combines a few different things together. The idea that only some of the Bible is divinely inspired is fairly unconventional. The notion that, for example, scientific advancements are a source of divine knowledge is pretty weird, but most Christians would accept that God can personally confer truth upon those who believe in Him.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.