Hillary Launches Re-election Website (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 09:11:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Hillary Launches Re-election Website (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Hillary Launches Re-election Website  (Read 5254 times)
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

« on: July 13, 2005, 10:36:21 PM »


Stop it.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

« Reply #1 on: July 13, 2005, 10:44:43 PM »


Hey, Schumer pulled 71% in 2004.  Maybe Hillary can do one better... 72%?

I know. It's breaking my heart.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2005, 11:02:32 PM »


Just suck it up and vote for her.  Don't you want your first vote ever to be cast in favor of the winner?

I'd rather cast my vote for someone who isn't an opportunist.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2005, 03:17:18 PM »

I think Cox would be a much better candidate than Pirro. Pirro has too much of a background. While Cox's father-in-law was Nixon, no one cares about Watergate anymore.

The worst candidate would be John Spencer. He attacked Hillary for being a liberal in NEW YORK!!!! That's gonna work for sure....
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2005, 03:31:19 PM »

I think Cox would be a much better candidate than Pirro. Pirro has too much of a background. While Cox's father-in-law was Nixon, no one cares about Watergate anymore.

The worst candidate would be John Spencer. He attacked Hillary for being a liberal in NEW YORK!!!! That's gonna work for sure....

Pirro has problems.  Anyone associated with Nixon is going to have problems.  SPencer is just an utter moron.  Regardless the NY GOP (minus the Rudy & Bloomberg (& Mike isn't really even a Republican) is in very bad shape.  the state GOP is about as bad as the Illinois GOP or Texas Dem party

I'll conceede the NYGOP is as bad as ILGOP when we have to run Alan ing Keyes but I don't think that is going to happen anytime soon. In 2006 the NYGOP is in bad shape for Governor and Senate, but afterwards and for some of the other offices I don't think our chance are as bad as you make them seem.

I still doubt anyone is gonna care that Cox is related to Nixon.
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2005, 03:34:10 PM »

I expect Hillary to win 65-33 or so.

I expect you to have your head slammed in a car door but Smiley
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2005, 03:43:12 PM »

I saw Cox on CNN and all he talked about was how Hillary's a carpetbagger.  that won't work not if it didn't work in 2000.

It's better than attacking her for being a liberal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 13 queries.