Do you support the missile strikes on Syria?

[Klartext89]

Leftists and Neocons with their shared Russia psychosis cause they can't handle their respective election defeats are running the whole world in WW III!

Because of all this Russia nonsense talk Trump has to do it...

I'm not in support of it because the risk is too high.

[Klartext89]

Thought Americans would learn their lessions but they just love war too much.

Iraq proved that overly hawkish foreign policy is bad. However, the Syrian civil war, which saw no US intervention, proved that overly dovish foreign policy is not the solution and Obama shifted too far in the other direction. An invasion of Syria and regime change, especially if done badly, would be unwise, but allowing Assad to continue to use chemical weapons against civilians is also unwise.

Exactly. I don't understand what everyone wants the administration to do - allow the current situation to continue without a change? Basically a slaughterhouse managed by Putin and Assad?

Yeah let's get ISIS and their Turkish Sultan partner in charge!

Honestly, I don't see a single use for Assad in "going chemical" against women and children. It's smelling like fake like a fish after 2 weeks in the sun...

[Klartext89]

I agree with EnglishPete and Intell (strange coalitions are forming).

[Klartext89]

I am going to lean towards no on this one. We should stay out of the Middle East unless we are attacked in my opinion, but it was handled well if we had to do this, as long as we don't send ground troops in I suppose this is O.K.

This.