~Half of Republicans (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:18:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  ~Half of Republicans (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ~Half of Republicans  (Read 13419 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« on: July 15, 2018, 03:29:15 PM »

There is nothing wrong with trimming a quote to only show the parts you want to respond to - I do that a lot so my posts are easier to read and also so they do not take up valuable real estate on a thread page, but altering a quote to fundamentally change the meaning of a person's post is not appropriate, imo. Although sometimes it is harmless if the user makes it clear its a joke, and so long as the original poster doesn't care.

I also agree with this, and truncating a quote to make it misleading, particularly if intended to embarrass (unfairly) a poster is not acceptable and will be infracted as either a personal attack or inappropriate. And of course such conduct leads to the discussion we have here about the matter, which gets everything off topic, and can lead to animus and flame wars. However the "perp's" posts appear to have been deleted, so I am going to let it go this time.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2018, 03:57:12 PM »

There is nothing wrong with trimming a quote to only show the parts you want to respond to - I do that a lot so my posts are easier to read and also so they do not take up valuable real estate on a thread page, but altering a quote to fundamentally change the meaning of a person's post is not appropriate, imo. Although sometimes it is harmless if the user makes it clear its a joke, and so long as the original poster doesn't care.

I also agree with this, and truncating a quote to make it misleading, particularly if intended to embarrass (unfairly) a poster is not acceptable and will be infracted as either a personal attack or inappropriate. And of course such conduct leads to the discussion we have here about the matter, which gets everything off topic, and can lead to animus and flame wars. However the "perp's" posts appear to have been deleted, so I am going to let it go this time.

Thank you Torie.
Clearly the user did it intentionally, because after I indicated that it was not appropriate, he then repeated it again in a second post, to be vindictive.
But Virginia cleared the posts that were in violation, so all is fine now.

Thereby saving the poster from infraction points. Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.