Who will have a better showing?

[Torie]

Well since I think Huntsman has some chance of becoming POTUS with odds a bit more than fanciful, and T-Paw does not ...

[Torie]

Well since I think Huntsman has some chance of becoming POTUS with odds a bit more than fanciful, and T-Paw does not ...

How would he win the nomination, Torie?

Mittens needs to stumble, and Huntsman needs to impress in the debates, and probably show substantially better than Mittens against Obama in the polls. I don't think the rest of the field is in the hunt. They are all losers - all of them. Give it time. T-Paw will be out in the near future. That leaves two candidates with some credibility. Yes, Perry will start out with some, but will fade in a hurry if he is foolish enough to get into this fray. With the klieg lights on him, it won't take long.

[Torie]

Yes, I know Huntsman is a long shot, Sam, but let's see how he does in the debates, OK?  By the way, even Hugh Hewitt admitted that Bachmann is unelectable against Obama, so in the end, it has to be somebody that really seems creditable to put their family pics on the Oval office desk. And it will be. And looking at the list, I don't see anyone creditable but the two Mormons (sorry, T-Paw means well, but he's a nebbish). Don't blame me!