MT (PPP): Bullock +2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:26:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  MT (PPP): Bullock +2 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MT (PPP): Bullock +2  (Read 3126 times)
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
« on: July 13, 2020, 07:14:23 PM »

I feel like this could be like MO senate 2016

If polls were correct and Clinton had won Democrats likely would have picked up that seat.

It's astounding how much better of a candidate Jason Kander was than Claire McCaskill.  Kander outran the top of his ticket by several points in an R-leaning presidential year, while McCaskill lost (and not in a squeaker, either, but by a relatively clear margin of 5-6 points) in a D-leaning midterm.

If Kander had ran in 2018 rather than in 2016, I think he would have pulled it off. That he came as close as he did in a year that Trump took the state by 19 points is itself very impressive.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.