Liberty v Security (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:48:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Liberty v Security (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Are security measures justified to the extent that civil liberties can be sacrificed?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
No Opinion
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 30

Author Topic: Liberty v Security  (Read 2819 times)
Virginian87
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,598
Political Matrix
E: -3.55, S: 2.70

« on: August 09, 2005, 07:53:40 AM »

Let's just throw in a huge debate on the Patriot Act because you know that's where this is going.  In times of war it is necessary for the government to take certain precautions to keep our country secure from terrorist/enemy attacks and to prevent our enemies from receiving any crucial intelligence.  These measures have been taken in almost every war we've ever fought in (Remember the "Loose lips sink ships" posters of WWII?).  However, these measures may also be considered as extreme and unnecessary in some cases, such as the Japanese internment camps of WWII and Lincoln's suspension of some civil liberties during the War Between the States.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 13 queries.