KS Sen GE 2020, Bollier vs Kobach, Rate It (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 11:08:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  KS Sen GE 2020, Bollier vs Kobach, Rate It (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: KS Sen GE 2020, Bollier vs Kobach, Rate It
#1
Safe R
#2
Likely R
#3
Lean R
#4
Tilt R
#5
Tilt D
#6
Lean D
#7
Likely D
#8
Safe D
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: KS Sen GE 2020, Bollier vs Kobach, Rate It  (Read 3420 times)
One Term Floridian
swamiG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,041


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: 3.13

« on: January 13, 2020, 01:57:16 AM »

Tilt D and only because it's a federal race in a presidential year; would have been Likely D in a Trump midterm. Kobach is too toxic to make this an easy race for Republicans, even in ruby red KS
Logged
One Term Floridian
swamiG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,041


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: 3.13

« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2020, 02:05:07 AM »
« Edited: January 13, 2020, 02:08:51 AM by swamiG »

Likely R.
2018 was a wave year and even then Kelly only narrowly edged out Kobach (plus Orman skewed the results a bit)
Bollier is a strong candidate for the State and could surprise us, but I am skeptical.

I wouldn't say Kelly's 5-point win was narrow...plus as you said Orman skewed the results; she would have easily garnered a majority and won by even more without Orman siphoning away nearly 7% of the vote. Kobach's 43% statewide showing was utterly abyssal for a Republican running anywhere in the Great Plains
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.