Laki v. Young Texan

[LAKISYLVANIA]

It is the opinion of this court that none of the prospective charges to be filed here took place within any physical boundary in Atlasia; the alleged conduct took place entirely in online chatrooms and the cosntituent forum with no physical present required for any of the involved actions. Thus there is no mandatory constitutional venue in this case.

Due to the direct involvement of the governments of the other two regions, the Supreme Court has decided that Lincoln is the appropriate venue for proceedings and has appointed me to preside.

Grand Jury proceedings will begin immediately. I will post a separate thread for those proceedings to begin. The defense counsel is hereby ordered to refrain from posting in that thread directly; I also ask that all others aside from the justices of the Supreme Court, the selected grand jurors, and those authorized by the prosecution refrain from posting in that thread. To begin, I ask that the prosecution respond to that thread listing all the individuals it wishes to charge and each crime it seeks to charge each individual. Following this, the court will proceed to selection of the grand jury.

The prosecution has introduced new evidence of acts which occurred within the physical boundary of the South, namely resolutions passed by the Southern legislature, and executive orders issued by the President of the South. This evidence shows a clear territorial nexus to the Southern region and therefore I request that venue be immediately transferred from Lincoln to the South.

Furthermore, I request that the court hold Laki in criminal contempt and move that the current indictments be quashed due to the posting of fabricated evidence. I never expected the prosecution to resort to such illegal and immoral tactics, but that is nevertheless what has happened.

Laki in the Grand Jury thread posted the following evidence:

Something that was actually seriously being discussed in the senate as part of the Regional Rights Amendment, giving an amendment proposal was to make the ownership of nuclear weapons a regional right, something that would've fitted these plans perfectly.



Would you trust nuclear weapons being a regional right when you have a Southern President who discusses plans about supposedly the purchase/annexation of Iceland and the Faroe Islands after Greenland, but also specifically about having the oil and the nukes to be able to destroy the world.

Reproduced here:


This screenshot is edited. The actual screenshot is as follows:



I can provide a Justice of the Court access to the SEXIT chat to provide proof of this. Shame on the prosecution.

Can you proof this is fake?

[LAKISYLVANIA]

It is the opinion of this court that none of the prospective charges to be filed here took place within any physical boundary in Atlasia; the alleged conduct took place entirely in online chatrooms and the cosntituent forum with no physical present required for any of the involved actions. Thus there is no mandatory constitutional venue in this case.

Due to the direct involvement of the governments of the other two regions, the Supreme Court has decided that Lincoln is the appropriate venue for proceedings and has appointed me to preside.

Grand Jury proceedings will begin immediately. I will post a separate thread for those proceedings to begin. The defense counsel is hereby ordered to refrain from posting in that thread directly; I also ask that all others aside from the justices of the Supreme Court, the selected grand jurors, and those authorized by the prosecution refrain from posting in that thread. To begin, I ask that the prosecution respond to that thread listing all the individuals it wishes to charge and each crime it seeks to charge each individual. Following this, the court will proceed to selection of the grand jury.

The prosecution has introduced new evidence of acts which occurred within the physical boundary of the South, namely resolutions passed by the Southern legislature, and executive orders issued by the President of the South. This evidence shows a clear territorial nexus to the Southern region and therefore I request that venue be immediately transferred from Lincoln to the South.

Furthermore, I request that the court hold Laki in criminal contempt and move that the current indictments be quashed due to the posting of fabricated evidence. I never expected the prosecution to resort to such illegal and immoral tactics, but that is nevertheless what has happened.

Laki in the Grand Jury thread posted the following evidence:

Something that was actually seriously being discussed in the senate as part of the Regional Rights Amendment, giving an amendment proposal was to make the ownership of nuclear weapons a regional right, something that would've fitted these plans perfectly.



Would you trust nuclear weapons being a regional right when you have a Southern President who discusses plans about supposedly the purchase/annexation of Iceland and the Faroe Islands after Greenland, but also specifically about having the oil and the nukes to be able to destroy the world.

Reproduced here:


This screenshot is edited. The actual screenshot is as follows:



I can provide a Justice of the Court access to the SEXIT chat to provide proof of this. Shame on the prosecution.

Can you proof this is fake?

Yes, we will let any Justice (or designated representative of the Court) into the SEXIT chat to show that the screenshot has been edited.

No i'm specifically asking for this one



which was not made in SEXIT.

[LAKISYLVANIA]

It is the opinion of this court that none of the prospective charges to be filed here took place within any physical boundary in Atlasia; the alleged conduct took place entirely in online chatrooms and the cosntituent forum with no physical present required for any of the involved actions. Thus there is no mandatory constitutional venue in this case.

Due to the direct involvement of the governments of the other two regions, the Supreme Court has decided that Lincoln is the appropriate venue for proceedings and has appointed me to preside.

Grand Jury proceedings will begin immediately. I will post a separate thread for those proceedings to begin. The defense counsel is hereby ordered to refrain from posting in that thread directly; I also ask that all others aside from the justices of the Supreme Court, the selected grand jurors, and those authorized by the prosecution refrain from posting in that thread. To begin, I ask that the prosecution respond to that thread listing all the individuals it wishes to charge and each crime it seeks to charge each individual. Following this, the court will proceed to selection of the grand jury.

The prosecution has introduced new evidence of acts which occurred within the physical boundary of the South, namely resolutions passed by the Southern legislature, and executive orders issued by the President of the South. This evidence shows a clear territorial nexus to the Southern region and therefore I request that venue be immediately transferred from Lincoln to the South.

Furthermore, I request that the court hold Laki in criminal contempt and move that the current indictments be quashed due to the posting of fabricated evidence. I never expected the prosecution to resort to such illegal and immoral tactics, but that is nevertheless what has happened.

Laki in the Grand Jury thread posted the following evidence:

Something that was actually seriously being discussed in the senate as part of the Regional Rights Amendment, giving an amendment proposal was to make the ownership of nuclear weapons a regional right, something that would've fitted these plans perfectly.



Would you trust nuclear weapons being a regional right when you have a Southern President who discusses plans about supposedly the purchase/annexation of Iceland and the Faroe Islands after Greenland, but also specifically about having the oil and the nukes to be able to destroy the world.

Reproduced here:


This screenshot is edited. The actual screenshot is as follows:



I can provide a Justice of the Court access to the SEXIT chat to provide proof of this. Shame on the prosecution.

I move to dismiss this case for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant parties.

Likewise, in addition to renewing request for sanctions in response to the special prosecutor's introduction of tampered evidence, I move that additional sanctions be placed against the special prosecutor, as the special prosecutor admitted to the indictment of persons for purpose of jury tampering:



To that end, I move that indictments not supported by probable cause be dismissed with prejudice

I thought you didn't recognise the juridisiction of the court.

[LAKISYLVANIA]

It is the opinion of this court that none of the prospective charges to be filed here took place within any physical boundary in Atlasia; the alleged conduct took place entirely in online chatrooms and the cosntituent forum with no physical present required for any of the involved actions. Thus there is no mandatory constitutional venue in this case.

Due to the direct involvement of the governments of the other two regions, the Supreme Court has decided that Lincoln is the appropriate venue for proceedings and has appointed me to preside.

Grand Jury proceedings will begin immediately. I will post a separate thread for those proceedings to begin. The defense counsel is hereby ordered to refrain from posting in that thread directly; I also ask that all others aside from the justices of the Supreme Court, the selected grand jurors, and those authorized by the prosecution refrain from posting in that thread. To begin, I ask that the prosecution respond to that thread listing all the individuals it wishes to charge and each crime it seeks to charge each individual. Following this, the court will proceed to selection of the grand jury.

The prosecution has introduced new evidence of acts which occurred within the physical boundary of the South, namely resolutions passed by the Southern legislature, and executive orders issued by the President of the South. This evidence shows a clear territorial nexus to the Southern region and therefore I request that venue be immediately transferred from Lincoln to the South.

Furthermore, I request that the court hold Laki in criminal contempt and move that the current indictments be quashed due to the posting of fabricated evidence. I never expected the prosecution to resort to such illegal and immoral tactics, but that is nevertheless what has happened.

Laki in the Grand Jury thread posted the following evidence:

Something that was actually seriously being discussed in the senate as part of the Regional Rights Amendment, giving an amendment proposal was to make the ownership of nuclear weapons a regional right, something that would've fitted these plans perfectly.



Would you trust nuclear weapons being a regional right when you have a Southern President who discusses plans about supposedly the purchase/annexation of Iceland and the Faroe Islands after Greenland, but also specifically about having the oil and the nukes to be able to destroy the world.

Reproduced here:


This screenshot is edited. The actual screenshot is as follows:



I can provide a Justice of the Court access to the SEXIT chat to provide proof of this. Shame on the prosecution.

I move to dismiss this case for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant parties.

Likewise, in addition to renewing request for sanctions in response to the special prosecutor's introduction of tampered evidence, I move that additional sanctions be placed against the special prosecutor, as the special prosecutor admitted to the indictment of persons for purpose of jury tampering:



To that end, I move that indictments not supported by probable cause be dismissed with prejudice

I accuse the defendants counsel for fabricating "fabricated evidence" and thus contempt of court and obstruction of justice.



Here is proof of that.

[LAKISYLVANIA]

More importantly

Lawyer Reagente knew how to fabricate the evidence and told the prosecutor exactly how to do it.

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Thank you, counsel, for your detailed motion. While your argument is eloquently crafted, it is built on a flawed premise.

You argue that the Right to Confrontation requires an individual witness to come forth and authenticate the evidence from the SEXIT 2.0 chat, as if the chat itself was an accuser hiding behind the prosecution. However, this is a misinterpretation of the principle.

The nature of the SEXIT 2.0 evidence does not necessitate an individual witness for authentication, because the chat records are not testimonial evidence offered by an individual accuser. They are documentary evidence that stands on its own, much like security footage, bank records, or written contracts. Such evidence can be authenticated without necessarily requiring a particular witness to testify to its veracity, assuming it fulfills other evidentiary requirements.

Furthermore, it's important to note the Right to Confrontation is not an absolute right. The courts have consistently allowed exceptions to the rule where necessary, such as in cases involving child abuse victims or where a witness is unavailable but has given prior testimony under oath.

Now, addressing your second point, I must raise a serious concern. I noticed that the original request made on July 3rd was edited today, on July 22nd. This raises questions about the integrity of this motion and your motivations for such a modification.

In light of this, I ask the court to take into account the late alterations made to this motion, which may well be an attempt to catch the prosecution off guard or otherwise mislead the court. In the spirit of fairness, it is crucial that any changes to arguments or requests be made transparently and promptly disclosed to all parties.

To conclude, I respectfully request that the court denies this motion, on the grounds that it is based on a misinterpretation of the Right to Confrontation, and that the late editing of the original request raises concerns about the integrity and motivations behind this motion.

[LAKISYLVANIA]

What needs to be done here moving on?