Scientists in the US are running for office to combat science-denial (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:28:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Scientists in the US are running for office to combat science-denial (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What do you think of 314 Action PAC and their STEM the Divide initiative?
#1
Freedom PAC
 
#2
Horrible PAC
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 45

Author Topic: Scientists in the US are running for office to combat science-denial  (Read 1750 times)
JA
Jacobin American
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,955
United States


« on: January 22, 2017, 01:21:30 AM »

https://qz.com/889950/scientists-in-the-us-are-running-for-office-to-combat-the-science-denial-descending-on-dc/

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

STEM the Divide will only be helping candidates who run for office on the Democratic ticket since they argue the Republican platform is too hostile to science.

I think this is a wonderful idea as there should be more experts and knowledgeable professionals from STEM, as well as other, backgrounds represented in our government. Perhaps then we'd have public policy that makes more sense and is founded upon empirical, rather than religious or ideological grounds.
Logged
JA
Jacobin American
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,955
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2017, 02:08:28 AM »

Buncha hacks. All the US can accomplish here is a drop in the bucket, and it's never gonna happen.

Well educated, intelligent, and successful professionals within the field of science are hacks, right... According to whom, exactly?
Logged
JA
Jacobin American
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,955
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2017, 10:15:12 AM »

It's unfortunate that the PAC thinks electing scientists can only help if they are Dems. Party leaders will listen more to those active in their party than those outside it. That's doubly true within a legislative caucus. If the goal is to combat science denial in public policy, the best course is to elect scientists who are Pubs.

I actually agree with you here. That's the one thing I dislike about this PAC. If you really want to change the way science is approached in public discourse, you need to influence the party that is most hostile to science from the inside.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.