Poll Results of Early Voters thread (user search)

Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon

Posts: 14,166

Re: Poll Results of Early Voters thread

« on: October 29, 2016, 04:02:07 PM »

Quote from: Maxwell on October 29, 2016, 03:51:03 PM

gonna go ahead and say that if Emerson is really showing Clinton running behind Murphy, that Emerson is trash.

Well, we didn't need this set of polls to know that.

Logged

Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon

Posts: 14,166

	Re: Poll Results of Early Voters thread « Reply #1 on: November 02, 2016, 11:24:23 AM »
	« Edited: November 02, 2016, 11:30:51 AM by Speed of Sound »

I feel a lot better about the CNN results if that's what they found in early voters in NV. ~~Those~~ NV's numbers are wrong wrong wrong.

Logged

Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon

Posts: 14,166

Re: Poll Results of Early Voters thread

« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2016, 11:30:30 AM »

Quote from: Ozymandias on November 02, 2016, 11:27:47 AM

Quote from: Speed of Sound on November 02, 2016, 11:24:23 AM

I feel a lot better about the CNN results if that's what they found in early voters. Those numbers are wrong wrong wrong.

The Arizona early voting results are actually consistent with what YouGov found (see upthread), but the Nevada results are much different from both Emerson and NBC/Marist, each of which showed Clinton with big early leads in NV.

Ah, thanks for the correction! My mistake. Yeah the big ugly outlier in that set is clearly NV. I think they have AZ a tiny bit too far right, but not much.

Logged

Pages: [1]

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? June 07, 2024, 06:39:19 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more