1916 Republican Primaries/Convention (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 06:45:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1916 Republican Primaries/Convention (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which one?
#1
Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Charles Evan Hughes of New York
 
#2
Governor Martin G. Brimbaugh of Pennsylvania
 
#3
Vice President Albert B. Cummins of Iowa
 
#4
Senator Charles W. Fairbanks of Indiana
 
#5
Senator Lawrence Yates Sherman of Illinois
 
#6
Mr. Henry Ford of Michigan
 
#7
Senator Theodore E. Burton of Ohio
 
#8
Senator William Alden Smith of Michigan
 
#9
Mr. Henry D. Estabrook of New York
 
#10
Mr. William Grant Webster of Illinois
 
#11
Senator John W. Weeks of Massachusetts
 
#12
Senator Elihu Root of New York
 
#13
Former Secretary of State Philander C. Know of Pennsylvania
 
#14
Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court William Howard Taft of Ohio
 
#15
President Robert M. La Follette of Wisconsin
 
#16
Former President Theodore Roosevelt of New York
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 38

Author Topic: 1916 Republican Primaries/Convention  (Read 2687 times)
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,669
United States


« on: January 30, 2013, 10:01:24 PM »

La Follette/Cummins.

We already had Presidents with more than two terms, so it's alright.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,669
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2013, 05:29:18 PM »

Anyway, I don't know how I'd vote.  Maybe Hughes or Smith.  TR would be good, too.  I really don't want La Follette serving more than two terms.

Will you vote for him over the racist Democrat in the general?

Oh, but of course!

To be fair, at least two of the Democrats running are objectively racist.

But Oscar Underwood wasn't.

Of course he was. He was a Democrat from Alabama! Tongue
Not all Southern Democrats were racists or segregationists, at least by the 50s and 60s.

Also not all of them were, even before then.

See: Huey Long.
I understood that Huey Long was a segregationist, even if he was left-wing for his time on most other issues.

You admit, then, that segregationism is a right-wing policy?

Checkmate Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 13 queries.