Which U.S. Senator is furthest ideologically from his/her state? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:57:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Which U.S. Senator is furthest ideologically from his/her state? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Byron Dorgan (D-ND)
 
#2
Kent Conrad (D-ND)
 
#3
Jon Tester (D-MT)
 
#4
Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
 
#5
Jeff Bingaman (D-NM)
 
#6
Tom Harkin (D-IA)
 
#7
Norm Coleman (R-MN)
 
#8
other (specify)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 31

Author Topic: Which U.S. Senator is furthest ideologically from his/her state?  (Read 2058 times)
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

« on: January 09, 2007, 04:16:46 PM »

Other: John Sununu, Judd Gregg and Wayne Allard

Sununu and Gregg are the last conservative, pro-life, right wing Senators left in the Northeast. Since they are close to home, they annoy me more. What do you mean BRTD by "libertarian leanings"? I am glad they switched their minds on the Marriage Ban in 2006 though, unlike Allard they see the writing on the wall (NH trending left)

I don't think Norm Coleman is all bad. I know it was just a token gesture but it was very important to me when he opposed drilling in ANWR. Token or not, there are no oil rigs there now killing wolves and caribou. He only won because Jesse Ventura condemned the Dems for turning Wellstone's funeral into a rally. No one would have noticed if Ventura hadn't decided to help the Republicans.

Colorado is heading left, but Allard is going in the other direction. He's the next Santorum.
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2007, 10:20:58 PM »

I don't think Norm Coleman is all bad. I know it was just a token gesture but it was very important to me when he opposed drilling in ANWR. Token or not, there are no oil rigs there now killing wolves and caribou.

Please explain to me how oil rigs kill caribou and wolves.   While I don't support drilling in ANWR I fail to see how this is possible.

I'm not an expert but here are some possibilities:

1. Chemicals and other pollutants seep into the local water table and over time harm the animals that live there.

2. Oil Rig Workers go out and hunt animals during their time off.

3. Wildlife (not suburban deer and the like) need huge open areas to live in, they would be frightened by the human activity and this would set off migrations. Where are all these animals going to go? Its not like there's an infinite amount of space even in Alaska outside the National Parks and Reserves. The reason is ANWR is so important is b/c it is one of the only areas left in the U.S. untouched by modern society.
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2007, 12:01:16 AM »

I'm not an expert but here are some possibilities:

I applaud you for your admission you are just guessing.  Caribou population in Alaska skyrocketed on account of more warmth, more mating, more offspring.

Thats incredibly untrue.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.