D'Amato pushes knife further into the gut of the NYGOP

[Cubby]

D'Amato's endorsement makes no difference.

Sptizer should stick to fighting crime.

His social views will lead New York only further down the road to moral bankruptcy.

Of course, I can't say Weld's social views are any better.

What a pathetic choice New Yorker's face.

Both leading candidates, Spitzer and Weld, are morally bankrupt.

Ahh you mean equality

No, actually, I mean moral bankruptcy.  From what I understand, both favor same sex marriage.  Marriage is not an equality issue.  Marriage is not a right.  Marriage is a privilege, for one man and one woman.

Only for another decade or two, civil rights will advance whether your church wants it to or not.

I knew when you were saying "moral bankruptcy" it was just a euphimism for seeing gays as filthy dogs. I'm glad you said what you really meant. You must have a lot friends in Rhode Island with that attitude.

BRTD is right, I knew that Kerry in favor of gay marriage, but he couldn't admit it or he would have done even worse in the South than he actually did. All of sudden Kerry is reasonable on an issue to you? Give me a break.

[Cubby]

D'Amato's endorsement makes no difference.

Sptizer should stick to fighting crime.

His social views will lead New York only further down the road to moral bankruptcy.

Of course, I can't say Weld's social views are any better.

What a pathetic choice New Yorker's face.

Both leading candidates, Spitzer and Weld, are morally bankrupt.

Ahh you mean equality

No, actually, I mean moral bankruptcy.  From what I understand, both favor same sex marriage.  Marriage is not an equality issue.  Marriage is not a right.  Marriage is a privilege, for one man and one woman.

Only for another decade or two, civil rights will advance whether your church wants it to or not.

I knew when you were saying "moral bankruptcy" it was just a euphimism for seeing gays as filthy dogs. I'm glad you said what you really meant. You must have a lot friends in Rhode Island with that attitude.

BRTD is right, I knew that Kerry in favor of gay marriage, but he couldn't admit it or he would have done even worse in the South than he actually did. All of sudden Kerry is reasonable on an issue to you? Give me a break.

Pym Fortuyn, my friend, you are the only one I have ever seen refer to gays as "filthy dogs," to quote you.  I have never and will never use such a disrespectful term in reference to my fellow human beings, and I bear malice toward no one. 

Myself, I have the same respect for gay people as I do for straight people.  I believe gay couples should have the same rights under the law as do straight couples, as to matters concerning tax laws, inheritance laws, spousal benefits, etc.

Gay people should be permitted to pursue their lifestyle without harassment form others.

I draw the line at same sex marriage, however.  Marriage is not an institution created by man, and it is not an institution that can be changed by man, in the grand scheme of things, is what I mean.

If same sex couples feel they have to have some kind of a legal bonding, then call it "civil unions," and leave "marriage" where it belongs, as the union of one man and one woman.

Yourself and others are certainly free to disagree with this aspect, and I, and others, are free to hold this belief.       

Fine, but to you its just a political/religious issue. To me its a slap in the face to say others can have a right but it is forbidden to me. I don't want civil unions, we have them in Connecticut and no one gets them, we are waiting for real marriage licenses, which actually mean something. Separate is not equal. As far as I'm concerned even Britain copped out, Spain and Canada have made the right decision.