Would you rather live in Urk, Netherlands or San Francisco? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:08:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Would you rather live in Urk, Netherlands or San Francisco? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would you rather live in Urk, Netherlands or San Francisco?
#1
Urk, Netherlands
 
#2
San Francisco
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 24

Author Topic: Would you rather live in Urk, Netherlands or San Francisco?  (Read 1797 times)
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

« on: March 05, 2010, 11:58:32 AM »

I suppose San Francisco, but Urk doesn't sound like an absolutely terrible place. On Wikipedia it says the city has the same birth rate as Utah, which seems bizarre by European standards. I wonder if there used to be a direct pipeline from Urk to God-Awful Sioux County, Iowa.
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2010, 01:18:37 AM »

How is Urk not terrible? It basically is Sioux County in Europe.

Because its in Europe so its like a classier, groovier version of Sioux County. Also, less cows and trailers.

Anyway, Urk is creepy. A place where over a third of the population votes for a party that until 2006 opposed female suffrage? Yeah, no thanks.

Yeah I'm starting to think this maybe isn't such a good place. Its not "terrible" in the sense of Utah or Uganda, but I'd steer clear of it. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.