Cory Booker vs Donald Trump

[Confused Democrat]

No, Booker is a corporate pig, plus Trump would imply Booker is a homosexual (has already happened in the senate race) which would cost him any male Trump voters.

I'm 99.9% sure that Booker is gay.

[Confused Democrat]

Depends whether or not the pro-Trump left manages to demonize him and brainwash progressives against him like they did Clinton. If he can avoid that, then he should be heavily favored.

You're like a parody of a Clintonista.

First of all, the "pro-Trump left" isn't really a thing. Sure, a few "leftists" here and there chose to support Trump, but that was more out of a desire to spite the Democratic Party and to send a big fat "f-you" to the Democratic establishment in Washington. And although I believe their support for Trump was misguided, it's hard to argue that they didn't achieve their goal.

A fire has now been lit under the asses of the Democratic establishment and the activist base of this party is fired up and ready to take over congress, governors mansions, and state houses all over the country in 2018.

Booker is not the ideal candidate for Democrats in 2020, and it's really not hard to understand why. He's despised by the Sanders wing of the party, plain and simple. Democrats need a candidate who can please both the Sanders and Clinton wings of the party. A candidate like Elizabeth Warren, Sherrod Brown, or Jeff Merkley.

[Confused Democrat]

Depends whether or not the pro-Trump left manages to demonize him and brainwash progressives against him like they did Clinton. If he can avoid that, then he should be heavily favored.

You're like a parody of a Clintonista.

First of all, the "pro-Trump left" isn't really a thing. Sure, a few "leftists" here and there chose to support Trump, but that was more out of a desire to spite the Democratic Party and to send a big fat "f-you" to the Democratic establishment in Washington. And although I believe their support for Trump was misguided, it's hard to argue that they didn't achieve their goal.

A fire has now been lit under the asses of the Democratic establishment and the activist base of this party is fired up and ready to take over congress, governors mansions, and state houses all over the country in 2018.

Booker is not the ideal candidate for Democrats in 2020, and it's really not hard to understand why. He's despised by the Sanders wing of the party, plain and simple. Democrats need a candidate who can please both the Sanders and Clinton wings of the party. A candidate like Elizabeth Warren, Sherrod Brown, or Jeff Merkley.

Careful. The other two are better choice but Warren may project as too far left for the palate of the electorate.

While there have been a few liberals and a few conservatives the majority of our presidents fall center right on a world wide scale.

She's not as far left as Sanders, and I believe Sanders would have beaten Trump.

Still, I understand where you're coming from when you say to be cautious of Warren. I agree that she'd be a weaker GE candidate compared to Brown or Merkley, but I believe she could pull it off in the right political climate.

[Confused Democrat]

I don't know who came up with dumbf*** idea about gender being the defining role behind the progressives rage against Hillary. You have to insanely dumb to consider that, but I guess we have plenty of dummies in here.

Hillary ran a negative campaign in the primary with McCaskill taking dirty shots, the Media, David Brock, cooking the debates with DWS & on & on while staying "honest" to the public. Obama never had a problem of "Honesty". Hillary Clinton lied to the people claiming no email was classified when it was send. Hillary flip-flopped on every issue, TPP etc - She was everyone, no authenticity.

How on earth could she be running when she send classified emails from her server? Or selling access for her Foundation?

Clinton also was "called out" for selling votes for money by both Obama & Warren. No1 can say Obama sold votes for money. No Wall Street Speeches behind close doors glossing over the Banks while he was about to run.

Obama was charismatic & was a phenomenal speaker. Clinton was a dummy who needed her speechwriter & Consultant to tell her how to talk, dress, look, behave, everything - She was a robot - Obama was a phenomenal talker & seemed "Honest". People could connect with him atleast & he had no scandals - Not 1 bit.

The Clinton supporters here ELECTED Trump & are to be blamed. And they will keep being stupid ignoring a pathetic candidate with calls about Gender !

Take a deep breath.