Would it be better for US to take a more neutral stance between Israel and Arabs since the 1960s? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 12:09:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Would it be better for US to take a more neutral stance between Israel and Arabs since the 1960s? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: US could have taken a more neutral stance between Israel and the Arabs. Do you think that would have been better? Why?
#1
Yes, D/D leaner		  
#2
No, D/D leaner		  
#3
Yes, R/R leaner		  
#4
No, R/R leaner		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 56

Author Topic: Would it be better for US to take a more neutral stance between Israel and Arabs since the 1960s?  (Read 907 times)
GoTfan
GoTfan21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Australia


« on: May 13, 2024, 03:35:02 PM »
The Shah only got the authority he did because Eisenhower and Churchill wanted to remove a democratically elected socialist government that was going to use Iran's resources to benefit Iran. Basically, Mossadegh was shoved from power by the West because he put the interests of Iranians ahead of Western interests, and the West simply couldn't have that. It was that same dubious logic that led to US interventionism all over the world for much of the Cold War.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 14 queries.