Who should Democrats have nominated for President in 2008? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 12:40:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Who should Democrats have nominated for President in 2008? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Barack Obama
 
#2
Hillary Clinton
 
#3
John Edwards
 
#4
Bill Richardson
 
#5
Joe Biden
 
#6
Chris Dodd
 
#7
Mike Gravel
 
#8
Dennis Kucinich
 
#9
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 52

Author Topic: Who should Democrats have nominated for President in 2008?  (Read 602 times)
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,545
Norway


P P P

« on: May 02, 2022, 11:41:12 AM »

1. Gravel
2. Pre-scandal Edwards
3. Obama
4. Gore
5. Clinton

But, I supported Obama from the day he announced, and while his naivete was his essentially his Achilles' heel (and Hillary, to her credit, went out of her way as SoS to lobby for the ACA... which did make me wince a little about my candidate of choice) I don't really regret doing so.

I was 13 at the time (12 when he announced) and this was the first election where I was really informed about the candidates and issues. In 2004 I supported Kerry because his hair was nice and he represented my neighbor to the north at the time - and he was the de facto "peace candidate."

Imagine my enthusiasm as a young politico full of hope and optimism. And then reality set in.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,545
Norway


P P P

« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2022, 12:02:08 PM »

In hindsight it's becoming clearer and clearer to me that candidates like Obama, those who make outrageous promises they have no intention of fulfilling (I know all politicians do this to some degree but Obama took it to a whole new level and many on both sides have been following in his footsteps since), are destined to destroy their party for a while especially if they serve two terms. They enrage the other side and they disappoint their own voters. Had Trump won reelection I suspect he would have left the Republican Party crippled for a few years in much the same way that the Democratic Party seems in Obama's aftermath.

I don't know what the country or the Democratic Party would look like in an alternate timeline, and it's entirely possible that the same consultant class of privileged liberal progressives would've taken over the party after her reelection and put the Democrats in much the same situation that they are in now. That said, I find it hard to believe that if 2008 Hillary had won there would have been quite the same immediate backlash there was to Obama.

In a way, Bill Clinton had the same problem. He didn't run on an "ambitiously progressive" agenda, but his 1992 campaign was objectively one of the most effective ones in history. Then his approval took a dive shortly after he took office (Whitewater) and then of course 1994 happened. And then Lewinsky.

And while people didn't approve of Republican overreach in impeaching Clinton, neither did they feel like they could trust Clinton as someone with integrity. So long Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky, West Virginia... and later Iowa and Ohio.

But still, that "permanent Democratic majority" will come any day now!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.