ScottSurveys: The Regional Restructuring Amendment of 2012 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 02:43:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  ScottSurveys: The Regional Restructuring Amendment of 2012 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What is your opinion of the recently proposed Regional Restructuring Amendment of 2012, and the region you are currently living in?
#1
Positive (Northeast)
 
#2
Negative (Northeast)
 
#3
Positive (Mideast)
 
#4
Negative (Mideast)
 
#5
Positive (Southeast)
 
#6
Negative (Southeast)
 
#7
Positive (Midwest)
 
#8
Negative (Midwest)
 
#9
Positive (Pacific)
 
#10
Negative (Pacific)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 29

Author Topic: ScottSurveys: The Regional Restructuring Amendment of 2012  (Read 2600 times)
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,439
Norway


P P P

« on: May 21, 2012, 07:44:59 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This poll will run for seven days, and you may change your vote.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,439
Norway


P P P

« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2012, 07:50:31 PM »

Positive, because hey, it's reform actually being proposed.

Just because it's a reform doesn't mean it should be enacted...
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,439
Norway


P P P

« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2012, 08:08:34 PM »

Neutral.


I hate reducing the number of Senate seats.


What this will come down to is what is the path of least resistance. If you want to reduce the number of regions do you reduce the Senate's composition, or do you give the finger to the Regional Rights movement?

We don't have to reduce the number of Senators to reduce the number of regions.  As I've said, there was a proposal earlier to merge the Mideast and Pacific but let the regions keep their borders for representation purposes.  It's probably not going to be enacted because most Pacific and Mideast voters apparently do not want to be merged, but it's a much better idea than this garbage.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,439
Norway


P P P

« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2012, 08:21:40 PM »

Neutral.


I hate reducing the number of Senate seats.


What this will come down to is what is the path of least resistance. If you want to reduce the number of regions do you reduce the Senate's composition, or do you give the finger to the Regional Rights movement?

We don't have to reduce the number of Senators to reduce the number of regions.  As I've said, there was a proposal earlier to merge the Mideast and Pacific but let the regions keep their borders for representation purposes.  It's probably not going to be enacted because most Pacific and Mideast voters apparently do not want to be merged, but it's a much better idea than this garbage.

Would that be possible with Antonio's map, which is the one I was asked to introduce? If so, then fine we have three options to deal with implications for the Senate rather than just two obviously horrible choices.

I don't see why not.  I don't have many problems with Antonio's map, but eliminating Senate positions will have the exact opposite effect of what we are trying to achieve.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.