Why is homosexuality "bad" to some people? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 07:37:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Why is homosexuality "bad" to some people? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What homosexual action in homosexual relationships makes homosexuality "bad" or "wrong"?
#1
The Actual Buttsex
 
#2
The Annoyingness of the seeming obsession with Fashion, Interior Design, Performing Arts and general girlieness
 
#3
If there's two men, then where's the vagina?
 
#4
Simple. If people are gay, how will we be able to raise a large army or workforce?
 
#5
The arbitrary will of God
 
#6
Some Alternative Theory (which you will explain)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 48

Author Topic: Why is homosexuality "bad" to some people?  (Read 22570 times)
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« on: August 26, 2008, 12:59:39 PM »

Why is murder "bad" to some people?
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2008, 01:36:43 PM »

Sure. But what authority ordains that it is "bad" to harm someone? That value judgment is just as arbitrary as condemnation of sexual deviancy.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2008, 01:48:02 PM »

You're presupposing that there is a "right to life." That is an arbitrary value judgment, precisely as with condemnation of homosexuality.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2008, 02:12:22 PM »

The point is that no normative value can be derived solely from fact. Some are derivative values and others are "root" values; but in either case, a person adopts a standard not supported by objective considerations.

Unless, then, you're willing to denounce all morality, it's inconsistent to complain that critics of homosexuality can't offer a "reason" for their condemnation.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2008, 08:38:22 PM »

Unless, then, you're willing to denounce all morality, it's inconsistent to complain that critics of homosexuality can't offer a "reason" for their condemnation.

You'll notice I never said that.

Cool. So we both agree that the paradigmatic argument against moral condemnation of homosexuality—the one, mind you, that this thread clearly presupposes to be correct—is in fact fallacious. That was my only point.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 9 queries.