Overturning Roe vs Wade

[A18]

It should be overturned just because it's such an idiotic ruling.

[A18]

Its very easy to prevent people from crossing state lines to get abortions.  Congress can pass a statute prohibiting this practice, as it is interstate commerce and within the purview of the Federal Government.

It would seem to me that a state can not, in a single nation, forbid someone to enter another state. And when in another state:

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

[A18]

i also oppose overturning roe v. wade.

You support legalized abortion, but that doesn't mean you should support bullsh**t rulings.

[A18]

I would also very much like to see a Constitutional Amendment prohibiting abortions

Wingnut

Why? Most leftists support the fake amendment that makes abortion legal in all 50 states.

[A18]

I see nothing wrong with that, and no, no one's going to arrest women for miscarriages. Regardless, this has nothing to do with Roe v. Wade.

[A18]

Hardly deserving of the death penalty, and no, actually it is much less sinful than you.

[A18]

The term killed is factually accurate.

[A18]

The rest of your post does not justify the use of the first word

[A18]

It is accurate to say that a sperm is killed, and it's accurate to say that a fetus is killed.

[A18]

Follow a point, opebo. You said killing was an inaccurate term. You're incorrect. No one here said all killing was wrong, so don't change the subject just because you're so obviously wrong.

[A18]

That's not what we're talking about. You said it's inaccurate to use the word kill. That's false.

A fetus is human, and it is life. That said, human life isn't necessarily significant at all of its stages.

[A18]

I don't, and I never debated the point. That's not what we're talking about. Stop making asinine arguments like "it isn't alive."

[A18]

There is no "more alive." There's no such thing as being more alive than something else. Something is either alive, or it's not. A fetus is alive, so saying 'killed' is correct, not inaccurate as you falsely claimed.

[A18]

According to me?! That's a biological fact.

I don't oppose all killing. The fact that something is alive doesn't mean it shouldn't be killed. It's just dumb to keep claiming it isn't alive, as you have.

[A18]

Not 'killing,' killing. Like killing bacteria, or killing trees. It's killing, and you don't have to oppose it, but it's still killing, so quit making factually incorrect statements.

I'm not arguing about abortion. I'm arguing about a simple fact. I have not argued that a fetus should have any value. I have simply pointed out how dumb it is to insist it's not killing.

[A18]

By saying it can only live dependently, you are admitting it is alive.