Booker v. Harris v. Warren Primary (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:00:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Booker v. Harris v. Warren Primary (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: For whom would you vote in this three-way primary?
#1
NJ Sen. Cory Booker
 
#2
CA Sen. Kamala Harris
 
#3
MA Sen. Elizabeth Warren
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 86

Author Topic: Booker v. Harris v. Warren Primary  (Read 3352 times)
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


« on: January 09, 2017, 10:11:12 AM »

Reluctantly for Warren, if not a protest vote for some Dixiecrat
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2017, 12:17:30 PM »

Reluctantly for Warren, if not a protest vote for some Dixiecrat

SG is a perfect example of what old Southern Democrats were ACTUALLY like (without the poor civil rights stances, OBVIOUSLY): not a DINO, not some "conservative," and often times even more liberal than his Northern counterparts on class issues.  I'm not talking about people like Zel Miller who kept their heads above water in a rapidly conservative-ifying South, but rather the Southern Democrats who backed FDR and fought for "pork" spending for their states, largely to help the poor, who are now the victims of comically bad historical revisionism that marks them as right-wingers because "muh civil rights."
It appears that Northern liberal revisionists will have you believe that if you aren't on the frontlines of the civil rights debate, then you are a violent racist. I cannot even begin to tell you how many programs, schools and roads would not be in place in the South without "Dixiecrat" politicians, all of whom get painted with the broad brush of "segregationist". A lot of the Southern Democrats political history is very sad and shameful, but it is ridiculous to throw the baby out with the bath water and not recognize the left-wing accomplishments made by some of them.
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2017, 05:17:01 PM »

I think that too often Democratic politicians (well, really politicians from both sides of the aisle but especially the Democrats this year at least) campaign only for folks who are already voting for them. What did Clinton have to offer folks in Appalachia or in rural western communities? And honestly, going even further left on abortion is going to satisfy what demographic exactly? The pro-choice folks aren't defecting anytime soon and neither are most the social liberals, so why not tone the rhetoric down a bit or make it a little more palatable to moderates and conservatives. The base will still turnout for you and you will likely gain more than a few "Moral Majority" voters who disgusted by Trumps persona.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.