Massive Violent Anti-Milo Protests at UC Berkeley

[Dr. Arch]

When they go low we go high, right lefties?

These snowflakes often physically attack others.

So they're both snowflakes and dangerous assailants? How do these contradictions exist in... never mind.

I'm often baffled how people like you often post harmless-looking people, usually around the lines of a technocratic yuppie, as a stereotypical "snowflake," but then turn around and call them violent and dangerous when they bring out the pitch forks. Make up your mind already.

As for Milo, he's an idiot, and the ideas he spouts are dangerous. He purposefully goes to unwelcoming venues to victimize himself afterwards. He obviously wants to stir up trouble to then say he was right about whatever. Likewise, I don't support the violence from the other side either.

[Dr. Arch]

"If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view - NO FEDERAL FUNDS?"
--@realDonaldTrump
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/827112633224544256

Wow, hope that happens!

Lmao, what a foolish thing to say. As if the administration and the overwhelming majority of the university sat down and had a vote on raiding Milo's whatever.

[Dr. Arch]

...and cut off federal funding.

Is this "i think the administration was involved in the violence" or "i don't like Berkeley so cut their funding anyway"?

How about "the administration is complicit in fostering and promoting the environment where something like this is seen as acceptable and goes unpunished."

I don't know how the administration is responsible for hunting down anarchist cells in Oakland and arresting their members.