Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 12,454
![](./avatars/Democratic/D_PR.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: October 31, 2016, 09:34:28 AM » |
|
men: Clinton/Trump tie women: Clinton +5 income under $50k: Clinton +4 income $50-100k: Clinton +1 income over $100k: Clinton +4 whites: Trump +9 blacks: Clinton +76 (over Johnson) Hispanics: Clinton +22 urban: Clinton +27 suburban: Clinton +1 rural: Trump +15 Midwest: Trump +3 Northeast: Clinton +11 South: Trump +4 West: Clinton +14
Hispanics +22 for Clinton definitely seems low.
The regional breakdown is very good for Trump. He could conceivably win Florida, Ohio, Iowa, and Wisconsin/Michigan, according to this, meaning that he would win while losing by three. Clinton will be wasting a ton of votes in California.
LOL.
|