Why Gingrich is Bad (and Romney is Awesome): A Politico Megathread Spectacular (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 08:28:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Why Gingrich is Bad (and Romney is Awesome): A Politico Megathread Spectacular (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which is the most absurd objective proposed by Newt Gingrich?
#1
Putting mirrors in outerspace to light highways
 
#2
Colonizing the moon for resources such as moon rocks
 
#3
Repealing child labor laws so children can spend time in school being janitors rather than learning
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 81

Author Topic: Why Gingrich is Bad (and Romney is Awesome): A Politico Megathread Spectacular  (Read 40919 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,672
United States


WWW
« on: December 03, 2011, 12:04:55 PM »

I wonder if the average Tea Partier will recognize that Newt Gingrich is no different than Mitt Romney in that he is just as craven and ambitious, with no core ideology except of gaining power.

I can easily see Newt falling back to earth within the next couple of weeks -perhaps Michelle Bachmann, Rick Santorum, or Ron Paul will offer Tea Partiers a more meaningful alternative?  
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,672
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2011, 12:16:35 PM »

I wonder if the average Tea Partier will recognize that Newt Gingrich is no different than Mitt Romney in that he is just as craven and ambitious, with no core ideology except of gaining power.

I can easily see Newt falling back to earth within the next couple of weeks -perhaps Michelle Bachmann, Rick Santorum, or Ron Paul will offer Tea Partiers a more meaningful alternative?  

Newt has a proven track record of carrying water for the jmfcsts, Mitt doesn't.  We don't mind nominating a suck-up, we've done it before, but we have to trust that a candidate will carry our water, and we don't trust Mitt.  Period.

Roll Eyes

Why don't you run for President?  Or maybe some lower office in your area?  You certainly have the ego for it. 
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,672
United States


WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2011, 12:21:16 PM »

Newt was all talk in the 90s. He screwed us over then. What are you talking about?

Whom is this directed to, if I may ask?  Jmfcst?
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,672
United States


WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2011, 12:31:18 AM »

1972 (with Obama as Nixon, and the Newt as McGovern), here we go.....   
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.