I'm a bit curious here. What on earth are supposedly informed people on this board basing these ridiculous ideas that Clinton has committed some high crime on? Her predecessors did exactly the same thing.
Colin Powell made 1-2 emails from his gmail account. Hillary made a whole freaking Server of Clintonemail where she handled 1000's of Classified emails, some of which are "Top Secret" & can't be released. Some emails talk about throwing governments & so on & she claims all these 1000 or so emails plus the Top-Secret stuff were termed classified later.
To create a private server she may have given her password to her staffer which if she did is a direct violation & game over.
Her staff Bryan Pagliano who pleaded the 5th got immunity in this criminal investigation which many times when someone could be indicted, whether her or her staff. You don't throw around immunity.
Already Classified stuff were found in the account of Huma Abeddin or whatever her name is. This account was co-incidentally hacked by an online hacker. The hacker said he read Clinton's emails while gardening & for fun & this hacker exposed the clintonemail stuff.
The hacker has since been extradited. She also wiped her sever clean, deleted some 30,000 emails & then handed it to the FBI claiming those were personal emails. She did not discuss with the FBI or show them any of these emails while doing it. The FBI has recovered quite a section of these emails.
There is enough material there. The FBI has now called to interrogate 4 of Clinton's aides who have now gone for a "Common" lawyer so that they give the "same" story. Clinton may not be indicted but if anyone things this is a small thing, they are just being dumb,
Poll
