2018: Should the position on gerrymandering be heavily questioned by the media? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 04:18:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2018: Should the position on gerrymandering be heavily questioned by the media? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: skip
#1
Very Heavily Questioned
 
#2
Heavily Questioned
 
#3
Questioned
 
#4
Lightly Questioned
 
#5
Questioned Once
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 29

Author Topic: 2018: Should the position on gerrymandering be heavily questioned by the media?  (Read 676 times)
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,921
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« on: November 15, 2016, 07:13:01 PM »

Of course it should. But given that this is only about lawmakers using their power to suppress their political opponents, it will probably only receive token coverage. Especially if Trump somehow gets his twitter account back for the midterm.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,921
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2016, 06:44:25 PM »
« Edited: November 16, 2016, 06:53:06 PM by Virginia »

I thought that in MD both maps were passed by a joint resolution? Is there some sort of filibuster type thing in the lower chamber?

And what role does the FL governor have in interpreting anti-gerrymandering laws?

Maryland, like Florida, passes legislative maps by joint resolution, which is not subject to veto. However, the Congressional map is.

As for FL, whoever the next Governor is will be replacing 3 FLSC justices that are facing mandatory retirement in 2019. All of these justices happen to be Lawton appointees, aka votes crucial to overturning gerrymandered maps. An all-Republican bench would be more likely than not (imo) to defer to the legislature's "fixes", and possibly be prone to shooting down gerrymandering lawsuits entirely.

This has always been the weak spot for the Fair Districts amendments. Democrats would be wise to get initiatives for commissions on the ballot prior to the next round of redistricting.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.