The war on Sudafed (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 06:12:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  The war on Sudafed (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is the war on Sudafed stupid?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 23

Author Topic: The war on Sudafed  (Read 2445 times)
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« on: May 21, 2010, 02:15:28 AM »

Is anybody floored by the absolute stupidity of the right-wingers' war on Sudafed?

What I'm talking about here is the laws that have passed over the past 5 years or so that limit the amount of pseudoephedrine allergy drugs you can buy. Now right-wing lawmakers are trying to make it available by prescription only - in the name of fighting meth.

These laws have been an absolute failure. Meth is more out of control than ever, and prescriptions aren't meant to fight secondary abuses like this anyway.

More proof that our fascist lawmakers just don't think - or their brains are fried, so they can't think.

The whole War on Drugs is a failure, yet it keeps expanding.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2010, 02:18:28 AM »

Uh huh, so only "right-wingers" support these nanny state policies?

By very definition, this law is right-wing.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2010, 10:42:32 AM »

I'd heard that a lot of meth production had moved to Mexico from the U.S., which would indicate the war on Sudafed hasn't been pointless.

I bought some earlier this week because I have a cold. I went to the pharmacy counter at CVS, they scanned my driver's license barcode, and I signed on the cardswipe device. It was really easy, much less trouble than the old sign-in book. I don't see the problem in controlling this substance.

This fascist law inconveniences innocent buyers of Sudafed.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2010, 10:53:05 AM »

It makes me cry that you wrote that right below where I explained that it's no inconvenience at all.

Then cry all you want to, because this law is an inconvenience.

The only people punished by it are the innocent.

Whoever came up with the idea for this law ought to be impeached.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2010, 10:59:34 AM »

Why in the Wide, Wide World Of Sports hasn't the government been sued yet over this law?

So far, it's only been used to prosecute parents of sick kids and elderly grandmothers with allergies.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2010, 01:57:50 PM »

Actually, the one state that has had the most success in cutting down on meth labs is Oregon, which has a prescription only law.  It's not meth use, but the meth labs that are the real problem here, and unless we legalize meth, going to prescription-only for Sudafed is the best option available to rid ourselves of the toxic waste dumps known as meth labs.

Oregon has seen more meth labs and drug abuse since the prescription requirement was enacted.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2010, 02:04:37 PM »

I just can't believe 38.5% of you support expanding the drug war. I expected it to be close to 0%.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2010, 02:13:08 PM »

Also, keep in mind that some people will view legalizing pot and legalizing meth as two different issues. Meth is more than a small amount more dangerous than marijuana, so even some people who want to legalize pot might still want to fight against meth and other hard drugs.

I'm not saying meth is good. Not by any means.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,964


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2010, 03:15:11 PM »


This has been debunked already as drug war propaganda.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.