Will the Homosexual Agenda become an important issue in 2012?

[Joe Republic]

THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA

CLASSIFIED

0600  Gym

0800  Breakfast (oatmeal and egg whites)

0900  Hair appointment

1000  Shopping

1200  Brunch

1400	• Assume complete control of the U.S. Federal, State and Local Governments as well as all other national governments
	• Recruit all straight youngsters to our debauched lifestyle
	• Destroy all healthy heterosexual marriages
	• Replace all school counselors in grades K-12 with agents of Colombian and Jamaican drug cartels
	• Establish planetary chain of "homo breeding gulags" where over-medicated imprisoned straight women are turned into artificially impregnated baby factories to produce prepubescent love slaves for our devotedly pederastic gay leadership
	• Bulldoze all houses of worship
	• Secure total control of the INTERNET and all mass media for the exclusive use of child pornographers

1430 Get forty winks of beauty rest to prevent facial wrinkles from stress of world conquest

1600 Cocktails

1800 Light Dinner (soup, salad, with Chardonnay)

2000 Theater

2300 Bed



(Credit to the long-forgotten Internetizen who came up with this.)

[Joe Republic]

My point is why are 2 committed adults worried about getting approval or certified to be committed together, as if they only want to remain together because the government says they can, otherwise they will break up because there are no legal ramifications of a gay divorce.  2 people decide to be committed to each other with or without certification, it doesn't matter what other people in society think.  While I don't want to see anyone or couple face harassment because they are living in sin or having children out of wedlock, I think people no longer view a marriage certificate as essential towards validating their monogamous relationship. 

That's an argument against marriage in general, not just gay marriage.

I might be wrong, but I think HIV is more prevalent in the gay male community than in the straight community.  I don't know the percentage of condom use among the gay community or rate of promiscuouity.

But what does the spread of STDs have to do with gay marriage?  Are you suggesting that allowing gay people to marry will increase the spread of disease?  If not, what is the relevance of this line of argument?