Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 12:30:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)  (Read 28586 times)
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
« on: March 26, 2016, 05:34:24 PM »

As a Clinton supporter, I must say that this isn't really a bad night for me, because it will now be even more painful for the Berniebots to lose this race. And this actually makes my vote for Clinton in CA in June more important.
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2016, 05:36:43 PM »


And, unlike Bernie's college student base, actually vote in midterm elections as well. Reorienting the party towards young people is stupid.

The Berniebots think that winning young liberal white men and Blacks will be a winning coalition in the general. Nominating this guy would pretty much kill us in November. That's why I'm glad it's not happening.
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2016, 05:40:49 PM »

The Berniebots celebrating this Alaska win reminds me of the Romney supporters clapping and cheering when Alaska was called for them, even though they had already lost the election an hour ago.
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2016, 05:43:01 PM »


And, unlike Bernie's college student base, actually vote in midterm elections as well. Reorienting the party towards young people is stupid.

The Berniebots think that winning young liberal white men and Blacks will be a winning coalition in the general. Nominating this guy would pretty much kill us in November. That's why I'm glad it's not happening.

LOL, Bernie was just up 24 points in a nationwide general election poll.

And? You think these polls mean sh*t? Clinton was up 24 points a year ago as well.
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
« Reply #4 on: March 26, 2016, 05:47:20 PM »

The Berniebots celebrating this Alaska win reminds me of the Romney supporters clapping and cheering when Alaska was called for them, even though they had already lost the election an hour ago.

No need to be salty just because Sanders won a state.

I'm not salty. I'm just annoyed at delusional Berniebots who act as if their hero and savior can still win this race when it's clearly over.
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2016, 05:50:09 PM »


ahahahahahahahahaha You don't realize how ridiculous you sound, do you?

'BERNIE DID WELL WITH MINORITIES!!!!'

- 'When and Where?'

- 'WITH...UH... BLACKS!!!'

- 'Wait... what? Where?'

- 'IN...... UH........ VERMONT!'
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2016, 05:57:01 PM »


ahahahahahahahahaha You don't realize how ridiculous you sound, do you?

'BERNIE DID WELL WITH MINORITIES!!!!'

- 'When and Where?'

- 'WITH...UH... BLACKS!!!'

- 'Wait... what? Where?'

- 'IN...... UH........ VERMONT!'

Do you feel this annoyed because Clinton is not doing so well in these states or because you feel the campaign you support is potentially threatened and could have the nomination swept from under in a reverse sweep a la southern Clinton states?

Such a reverse sweep isn't happening and you know it. NY, PA, CA, MD, DE and NJ aren't 90%+ White so Bernie won't win there. I don't give a sh*t about Clinton losing Alaska, Montana or Idaho lol.
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
« Reply #7 on: March 26, 2016, 06:04:33 PM »

I'm prepared to hold my nose and vote for either candidate in November, but let's dispel with this fiction that Clinton is more electable than Sanders. The polls simply prove that wrong. The only two things Hillary has going for her in GE electability are support from neocons (who are starting to openly endorse her) and the fact that her reputation among independents is so damaged that even the dirtiest attacks from Trump cannot make it any worse. (which is actually quite a compelling argument in her favor, but still)

You are joking, right? Those polls don't mean sh*t as Sanders has never been attacked from Hillary or the Republicans.
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
« Reply #8 on: March 26, 2016, 06:09:09 PM »

Also, all the other results have clearly proven that Hillary's coalition is much more diverse and that she'd be a much stronger general election candidate. Hillary did extremely well in all the swing states so far, especially in Florida and Virginia, which are the most important ones. If Hillary wins Florida and/or Virginia in November, she'll be the next president.
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
« Reply #9 on: March 26, 2016, 06:12:35 PM »

Also, all the other results have clearly proven that Hillary's coalition is much more diverse and that she'd be a much stronger general election candidate. Hillary did extremely well in all the swing states so far, especially in Florida and Virginia, which are the most important ones. If Hillary wins Florida and/or Virginia in November, she'll be the next president.

Virginia is Leans D, Florida is Leans R.

Leans R if she does better than Obama with older Whites, white women and Hispanics? Yeah, sure.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 13 queries.